I think we pretty much agree except for semantics. The reason I posted those links in the first place was to say that there are peaceful Muslims and a number got all up in arms about that so I assumed you were with them. Otherwise, I think we completely agree.
I mean, one can be a perfectly "orthodox" mohammedan and never having to fire a gun, wave a sword at an infidel's neck or secretly finance Hamas or an Al-Qaeda terrorist cell. In fact, most of them are just plain regular people, some more zealous than the others, with all their beliefs, traditions and practices that cloud them in darkness about the true divine religion. Their condition is sad indeed but "orthodox" Islam doesn't make them all mujaheddins all of a sudden. Potentially, given the right conditions, they can be a serious menace but it really depends on the political situation of the islamic states and their willingness or unwillingness to wage a Holy War on the West.
In fact, these suicide-bombers in Palestine and Israel and the mobsters of Al-Qaeda are pretty much vigilantes on their own. They have no religious right to call upon a world
Jihad against the West since that enterprise can only be lawfully undergone by a muslim state or an islamic caliph. Well, no muslim state today is capable or is interested in waging war against the West and no caliph recognized by the whole islamic world remains today since the dissolution of the ottoman caliphate by the Republic of Turkey in the 1920's.
We have far greater problems than the muslims right now. Not that they should be invading europe in waves of immigration as they're doing now, but liberalism, modernism, masonry and international Jewry are doing us much more harm than these islamic communities in the West, most of them already completely won over to the material and liberal world anyway, as the "reformist" movements you quoted earlier on prove.
