Satan's Virtue; & mine?

[QueenofPuddings]

Actually the dagger might be quite handy for fighting off those lusty females. Apart from that I am totally in agreement about the Jesus-like standards. I will be posting them up at the back of church tomorrow. I can foresee disagreement about the footwear, however. Shouldn't they be wearing socks with those sandals?  Those naked feet, you know... bit of an incitement to sin, eh?

[VoxClamantis]

Oh, my gosh, you guys are hilarious today!  I am thinking that the man in pic #5 might need a ski-mask or something, though; he's pretty cute.

 

As to CV's question: except for the 1 in 10,000 men who has non-nauseating feet, it should definitely be a law that the male foot should be covered. Tightly. Locked up and hidden away. Not because of modesty, but because the sight is usually revolting (ever look at a baby boy's sweet little feets and feel rather sad at knowing what will likely happen to them?)

[Marty]

 

As to CV's question: except for the 1 in 10,000 men who has non-nauseating feet, it should definitely be a law that the male foot should be covered. Tightly. Locked up and hidden away. Not because of modesty, but because the sight is usually revolting (ever look at a baby boy's sweet little feets and feel rather sad at knowing what will likely happen to them?)

 

huh?

Men have good feet thank you very much

[Marisa]

 

No there are much more fashionable options available for you.  I propose that we make up a checklist for men of Jesus-like standards of dress.  Would Jesus have ever worn a pair of pants?  I think not.  Does he ever appear to mystics wearing pants?  Let this be your cue, men.  Who cares if people look at you funny- you will be doing the right thing, and maybe you will influence fashion for the better.

 

 That was great, Sophia!