Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 19, 2013, 11:02:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
 
Author Topic: Educated in a Tent  (Read 1900 times)
Mernoc
Guest
« on: July 15, 2006, 04:30:PM »

Educated in a Tent

by Bob Wallace

A few years ago, I ran across an article about a 52-year-old man who had lived with his 12-year-old daughter in a tent in a Portland, Oregon park for four years. When they were discovered, the girl was described as "well-spoken beyond her years." This girl, who would have been in the seventh grade, tested at the 12th grade level. What did her educational materials consist of? A set of old encyclopedias and a Bible.

Not long after, in one of those odd synchronicities that happen to all of us, I ran across another article about a father encountering three high-school girls who were talking about a party they had attended. He writes:

"Seemingly still semi-drunk from the party, the 16- and 17-year-old girls began to recount how much coke, weed, vodka, guys and girls they did the night before. Listening to the F-bomb riddled report of the previous night's peccadilloes left me thinking, how sad . . . and . . . what a waste . . . ."

He recounts how he and his wife pulled their daughters out of the public schools: "It's been eleven months since we pulled our teenage daughters out of the public school system and started to home-school them, and I could kick myself for waiting so long. The educational, emotional, spiritual and physical progress they have made has been amazing."

I'm certainly not defending an obviously very eccentric father raising his daughter in a tent from the ages of eight to 12. But I am sympathetic to his reasons. It's entirely possible his daughter might have turned into one of those 16- and 17-year-olds.

I find it bizarre that I am sympathetic at all to a man raising his daughter in a tent in a park. But I am. It's because of what the public schools have finally, after all these years, created: kids whom I wouldn't want for my own.

When I ask myself if I would like to be raised like that, of course I say, "No." But then a little voice says, "Remember seventh grade?" When it comes right down to it, in many ways the tent in the park would have been better.

When a girl raised in a tent in a park, with only a Bible and an obsolete set of encyclopedias, turns out so much intellectually and morally superior to kids from the public schools that a comparison isn't even close, it shows the public school are now beyond repair.

I'll bet this 12-year-old isn't damaged in the least. She certainly will have some interesting stories to tell for the rest of her life. As for the three girls soused on the coke and booze and weed? Who knows? Only time will tell. But I've met these people, lots of them, and so have you. Not all of them make it out okay.

What would I have done if I had been a police officer encountering this father and his daughter, living in their tent? Not much. I would have suggested to the father that maybe at the age of 12 she'd be turning into a young woman very soon, and perhaps he should take that into consideration. But I wouldn't have been too concerned about the situation. Amused, yes, and probably astonished, but overly concerned? No.

On the other hand, who wouldn't be concerned about the three drunken and stoned girls? Here's the kicker: exactly what could anyone do with them? The father and his daughter only needed a better place to stay. But what are you supposed to do with the three high school girls? How do you get them to straighten up? Your guess is as good as mine, and probably better.

I'm sure those who support the public schools had a conniption fit over this fundamentalist Christian father raising his daughter in a tent. Oh, the horror of it all! Yet, when it comes to those three girls and others like them, all we hear are excuses. And, of course, the eternal whining that more money is needed.

The public schools have been going bad for a long time. They were going bad when I was in them. Even with all the partying we did, we would have thought those three drunken and stoned girls were nuts, the kind almost all of us would have stayed away from. They were the exception then. Now it looks as if they are becoming the norm in some places.

Some people claim we need the schools to "socialize" kids. Schools don't socialize kids; they traumatize them. I am reminded of the popularity of Stephen King's first novel, Carrie, which was about the shark pit that high school can be. And King, who obviously based the novel on his time in school, went to high school in the '60s. Now it's 40 years later, and things are worse, not better.

When you stick a bunch of kids together who don't want to be together, the only way to control them is with authoritarian methods. And when no is looking, some of the kids will go after the others. In many ways, the public schools are just like prisons.

It truly appears the public schools appear to have finally gone over the cliff. No wonder home schooling is so popular. We need more of it. A lot more of it. And we certainly need the public schools closed down.

Logged
Texican
Если не я, то кто?
Member

Gender: Male
Location: here. there. everywhere!
Personality type: studený
Posts: 9,505


Déu, força, i honor


« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2009, 12:16:AM »



That is nice. You're not only having a tent but you also learn on it.


I predict your stay will be quite short-lived.
Logged

CanadianCatholic
Member

Gender: Female
Location: CaNaDa
Personality type: CrAzY
Posts: 5,579


Kickin @$$ and takin names


« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2009, 08:58:AM »

I dont especially think I want to homeschool '(never have the energy, or organization or patience for it) but I see what your saying about public schools I guess. My kids will go to private Catholic, run by my SSPX church, so Im lucky for hat I think. HOWEVER....I dont blame the schools for reject kids like that, I blame negligent parents. I know many many good Catholics, and good people in general that went to public school. Its all about the parents. Your kids are going to have to live in the world eventually, you cant hide them from it forever. You might as well teach them young to fight the world and live in it. Yeah, they are exposed to so much more there, but eventually they will eb too, when they aer out in the world as adults, no point in delaying it.
Logged
GraceSeeker
Member

Posts: 381



« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2009, 07:46:PM »

Quote
Yeah, they are exposed to so much more there, but eventually they will be too, when they are out in the world as adults, no point in delaying it.

Ooh... I disagree.  I think there are many good reasons to delay being in the "real" world for eight hours a day.  I once had it explained to me like this:

If you wanted to build a war ship... a ship who could withstand anything that weather or battles will throw at it... you would not build it out on the open seas.  The pounding waves and the scorching sun would cause damage as you were building.  Sure, you might be able to build some sort of vessel, but it would always have weak spots.  It might make it through a thunderstorm or two, but it would fall apart during a hurricane.

No, master shipbuilders build their ships in a protected environment.  During construction the ship is kept completely away from the elements.  Eventually she is taken out on brief trips, to check her seaworthiness.  If there are any leaks or problems they are spotted and fixed right away.  Only when she is fully built and tested to be strong is she sent out into the "real" world.

All I have to do is look around at my peers and see the high numbers of us on anti-depressants, alcohol, street drugs, divorces, etc... to know that the idea of tossing us into the real world at a tender age has not made us stronger or healthier or happier.
Logged
ErinIsNice
Member

Gender: Female
Posts: 1,372



« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2009, 10:11:AM »

I disagree with GraceSeeker---  just based on personal experience.

My friends from high school were all homeschooled (and on top of that, couldn't watch most tv or movies, couldn't wear whatever we wanted, etc), there were twelve of us altogether.  Now that all of us are close to 30, only half of us are still practicing Catholics.
Logged


newtolatin
Member

Posts: 1,047


« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2009, 05:47:PM »

I disagree with GraceSeeker---  just based on personal experience.

My friends from high school were all homeschooled (and on top of that, couldn't watch most tv or movies, couldn't wear whatever we wanted, etc), there were twelve of us altogether.  Now that all of us are close to 30, only half of us are still practicing Catholics.
Well, of my 20 family members who went all went to school, some of which were pre-V2 Catholic schools, 1 is still practicing.

The issue is much greater than homeschool vs school.
Logged

Other ages... are prone to faction, and it is our business to inflame them. Any small coterie, bound together by some interest which other men dislike or ignore, tends to develop inside itself a hothouse mutual admiration, and towards the outer world, a great deal of pride and hatred which is entertained without shame because the 'Cause' is its sponsor... Even when the little group exists originally for the Enemy's own purposes, this remains true.... The Church [H]erself is, of course, heavily defended... but subordinate factions within [H]er have often produced admirable results, from the parties of Paul and Apollos at Corinth down...." —The Screwtape Letters; number 7. C.S. Lewis
CanadianCatholic
Member

Gender: Female
Location: CaNaDa
Personality type: CrAzY
Posts: 5,579


Kickin @$$ and takin names


« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2009, 08:39:AM »

I really think it has so much to do with parenting. Out of the 13 in my fam, 9 are still practicing. We all went to private Catholic school, but that was kind of the problem really. We all went through a period in our early adulthood where we rebelled against it like crazy. Took most of us coming home single and pregnant to see the light again. I have friends that are amazing Catholics, who went to public school. I really really think its the parents, maybe they shouldn't expose their kids to all of the world, but to enough that when they get out there, they know how to handle themselves We were so sheltered, i had no idea you could say no to drugs and boys and stuff, and still be "cool". Again, this is based on my personal experience, but that's just how I feel.
Logged
Satori
Member

Posts: 7,614



« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2009, 10:38:AM »

There doesn't have to be only one way.

I live in a city where the public schools are so bad and so dangerous, that my child will go there over my cold, dead body. The Catholic elementary school seems pretty good, but the girls' Catholic high school looks like training for trollops and I wouldn't send her to the secular or Episcopalian private high schools even if I could afford them because I don't want her in that privileged, hot house environment (I went to schools like that and know what I'm talking about). So it looks as though unless something happens -- we move, somebody opens an awesome high school -- my daughter will at least have homeschool high school.

When I was a kid, homeschooling was very unusual and the only people who did it were weird fundamentalist types who didn't want their children to have sex ed or learn about evolution. Which is okay, but I'm not sure that it's a good reason on its own to homeschool. And I don't know that most of those mothers were really qualified to teach or that they had a good program or that the children got out much. Now I know people who homeschool because they are intelligent and well-educated and want their children to receive a better quality education than they could get in most schools. They are religious people, some of them, but they aren't so much sheltering their children as they are exposing them to the world on different terms, if that makes any sense.

There are some people who shouldn't homeschool. There are also children who it's a cruelty to send to a regular school.
Logged

"Skeptics will always prevail. God gives us just enough to seek Him, and never enough to fully find Him. To do more would inhibit our freedom, and our freedom is very dear to God." --Ron Hansen, "Mariette in Ecstasy"
samantha48
Member

Posts: 1


« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2010, 01:29:AM »

It is nice because even though they she was homeless together with her family, she still learn. It only shows that poverty is not the reasons to be educated.
Logged
amasimp
Member

Gender: Female
Personality type: Meloncholic
Posts: 371



« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2010, 12:00:PM »

There doesn't have to be only one way.

I live in a city where the public schools are so bad and so dangerous, that my child will go there over my cold, dead body. The Catholic elementary school seems pretty good, but the girls' Catholic high school looks like training for trollops and I wouldn't send her to the secular or Episcopalian private high schools even if I could afford them because I don't want her in that privileged, hot house environment (I went to schools like that and know what I'm talking about). So it looks as though unless something happens -- we move, somebody opens an awesome high school -- my daughter will at least have homeschool high school.

When I was a kid, homeschooling was very unusual and the only people who did it were weird fundamentalist types who didn't want their children to have sex ed or learn about evolution. Which is okay, but I'm not sure that it's a good reason on its own to homeschool. And I don't know that most of those mothers were really qualified to teach or that they had a good program or that the children got out much. Now I know people who homeschool because they are intelligent and well-educated and want their children to receive a better quality education than they could get in most schools. They are religious people, some of them, but they aren't so much sheltering their children as they are exposing them to the world on different terms, if that makes any sense.

There are some people who shouldn't homeschool. There are also children who it's a cruelty to send to a regular school.

Good points.  However, a broadter generalization can be made.  The decision to homeschool, Catholic school, public school is extremely personal and dependent on so many factors such as the parents, the needs and capabilities of the individual child, the quality of the schools in quesiton, money, etc.  A right decision for one family can be very much a wrong decision for another. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC