Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
June 18, 2013, 09:20:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
 
Author Topic: You must own a gun? Proposed Idaho Law  (Read 2573 times)
VoxClamantis
Guest
« on: September 22, 2006, 01:43:PM »

From fox12news.com:


 
 
Proposed Ordinance asks
Each Household to Have a Firearm

Sep 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT

 
 
 
Greenleaf, Idaho -- All Americans have the right to bear arms.  Some towns have even gone as far as to require each household to have a gun.   Now a small Idaho town is contemplating a similar idea-- it's called the Civil Emergencies Ordinance. And although gun ownership is just one piece of this ordinance, it's the part that's getting the most attention.
 
"We've blessed to be a fairly rural area of the state, so we don't have a lot of crime and I think we'd like to keep it that way," said Lee Belt, Greenleaf city clerk.
 
Drive about 10 minutes west of Caldwell and you'll run into Greenleaf, Idaho, population 860.  If city council member Steve Jett has his way, each head of household that can legally own a gun, will.  Along with that they're encouraged to have ammunition and appropriate training.
 
"I think the city council is hoping it will happen and that it will be a deterrent to crime as the city and region increases in population," said Belt.
 
The proposed ordinance is modeled after a similar plan that went into place in 1982 in Kennesaw, Ga.  In that instance there was a dramatic decrease in criminal activity.  Although crime isn't a huge problem for residents of Greenleaf, the growth in neighboring counties leads them to believe they too are in for some changes.

 

Quote
No-brainer, if you ask me. You're a criminal. You can pick on the big guy or the little guy, on the granny with the shotgun or the one without. Which do you choose?

 
"There's not a lot of crime here, but I think it's coming, it's getting worse everyday," said Art Bailey, owner of the Greenleaf Store.
 
While the plan does encourages firearm ownership, the ordinance goes beyond that.
 
"The largest part itself deals with emergency capabilities," said Belt.
 
The plan will establish an emergency response plan, and promote its citizen response teams and neighborhood watch volunteer groups, a proactive approach to keep the crime rate to a minimum.  So how have residents responded?  According to almost everyone we spoke to, they already owned a gun or multiple guns, so this would have no effect on them either way.
 
"I don't know if it is good for every household, but we being hunters have always had guns," said Bonnie Cagle, a Greenleaf resident.
 
"I think it is an excellent idea," said Bailey. "If the citizens are armed were not at a disadvantage."
 
We did ask to speak with the city council member who proposed the ordinance but he was out of town.  In November, the council will decide whether or not to adopt the ordinance.

Logged
creimann
Guest
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2006, 02:11:PM »

If enough countries lob terrorist strikes against us simultaneously and thereby disrupt social order, it will be a relief to be armed. Vote Yes.
Logged
QuisUtDeus
Guest
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2006, 02:57:PM »

To me Idaho is the promised land.  I want a compound,er, homespread there.

 

I'll call it "Quis Ut Deus Ridge"

Logged
Vandaler
Guest
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2006, 03:31:PM »

You Americans are pretty scary... and scared to.

This today on the wing of the "compromise" on torture, I must say, I'm not impressed at all.

Logged
kmomto6
Guest
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2006, 03:56:PM »

This has been the law in Switzerland for generations. Every household must have a weapon (if I remember correctly a particular kind and it must be test fired at least once per year).
No one seems to mess with the Swiss, although those nice Alps are quite the deterrent too.
Logged


Vandaler
Guest
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2006, 04:05:PM »

Quote from: kmomto6
This has been the law in Switzerland for generations. Every household must have a weapon (if I remember correctly a particular kind and it must be test fired at least once per year).
No one seems to mess with the Swiss, although those nice Alps are quite the deterrent too.

Really, thats interesting, I didn't know that.  Can that be also because they don't have any army to speak of?

Logged
MikeSearson
Guest
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2006, 05:44:PM »

The Swiss have a Citizen Army.

 

All able bodied men are required to maintain and be proficient with the arms in question and they drill often.

 

I considered emmigrating to Switzerland when I left the Corps.

Logged
Vandaler
Guest
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2006, 06:56:PM »

I see, I was about to ask another dumb question but I looked it up.  For some reason, I thought that because of their neutrality, that they had only a symbolical army. I stand corrected.

 

I agree with you Mike, Switzerland sounds like a great place to be.  I always been attracted to Scandinavian countries myself.  But eh, enough sidetracking, this is supposed to be about a small town with no troubles looking to arm itself to the teeth.

Logged
Catholicmilkman
Guest
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2006, 07:51:PM »

Quote from: Vandaler
But eh, enough sidetracking, this is supposed to be about a small town with no troubles looking to arm itself to the teeth.

One firearm per household is being armed to the teeth!? I don't think so. 

Logged
Vandaler
Guest
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2006, 07:59:PM »

Quote from: Catholicmilkman
One firearm per household is being armed to the teeth!? I don't think so. 

To me it is, I can't imagine having a gun home let alone the notion that all my neighbors would have also.  And that this would be have been planed by the town council is very foreign to me. Bizarre.

 

Especially that they are not really trying to solve anything, they have no problems.  Is nothing more then gun culture.

 

I respect that you don't agree... Different backgrounds I suppose. 

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC