Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 21, 2013, 12:51:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
 
Author Topic: receiving the Eucharist (hand or tongue?)  (Read 971 times)
Seminarian_Matthew
Guest
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2008, 05:28:PM »

Always receive Holy Communion on the tongue.  Last year I compiled many quotations from Church documents/leaders into a blog post to support the reception of Holy Communion on the Tongue.  You may be interested in some of the quotations:

http://acatholiclife.blogspot.com/2007/07/mission-restore-eucharistic-reverence.html

God bless you in seeking to defend the Truth!

Logged
karyn_anne
Guest
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2008, 07:34:PM »

Personally, still, i find licking up the fragments on your palm (to catch all the fragments remaining) reminiscent of that of licking up cookie dough, and it seems kind of disrespectful to be doing that to Our dear Lord.

For goodness' sake, just receive the Holy Eucharist on your tongue...i am going to see my former parish priest today (who is quite traditional) and will ask him to encourage his parishoners to receive on the tongue and to cut down on the great number of EHMCs in the church.

i love the example quoted by maso!
Logged
maso
Member

Posts: 1,110


« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2008, 09:33:AM »

There is agood mean for a priest to stop with the Communion in the hand and the abuse of EEM. I saw this in last jan 2007 in Rome: The priest gave the communion under the two species by dipping the host in the wine (that only a priest can do) an placed it in the attendant's mouth since it is impossible in the hand.
This way of doing perfectly matches the Redemptoris Sacramentum instructions.
It would be simple that the Pope rules that as the only way to give Communion.
I had a dream...
Logged
NorthernTrad
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,767



« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2008, 09:49:AM »

Quote from: maso
There is agood mean for a priest to stop with the Communion in the hand and the abuse of EEM. I saw this in last jan 2007 in Rome: The priest gave the communion under the two species by dipping the host in the wine (that only a priest can do) an placed it in the attendant's mouth since it is impossible in the hand.
This way of doing perfectly matches the Redemptoris Sacramentum instructions.
It would be simple that the Pope rules that as the only way to give Communion.
I had a dream...

Or he could order that people kneel down in adoration and recieve on the tongue as they always have.
Logged

"I'm back sinners."

“Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ.” - St. Athanasius, AD 373

"It is granted to few to recognize the true Church amid the darkness of so many schisms and heresies, and to fewer still so to love the truth which they have seen as to fly to its embrace." -St. Robert Bellarmine
maso
Member

Posts: 1,110


« Reply #14 on: January 05, 2008, 11:38:AM »

Yes,
But coming back to the multisecular mode would trigger new difficulties from the modernists like those we see with the Tridentine mass, considering this as "retrograde".
On the contrary, the Eucharist under the two species exclusive as the sole way of Communion for all the faithfuls, may be presented like a progress that they would be obliged to accept while in the same time stopping the communion in the hand.
Logged


Pages: 1 [2]
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC