Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
June 19, 2013, 05:37:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 41
 
Author Topic: Can Anyone Show Me One Or More Parts of The Ordinary Of The Novus Ordo Missal That Is Contrary To Catholicism ?  (Read 19879 times)
Whitey
Guest
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2008, 01:35:AM »

Thanks to all who replied so far. I'm convinced the NO Ordinary is flawed in some ways. That is obvious. But still, it is not non-catholic or evil imo.

H.E.Ottaviani gives a solid argument, but the part I bolded below indicates, imo, that the problem is poor catechesis and lack of Faith......................

"Most Holy Father, Having carefully examined, and presented for the scrutiny of others, the Novus Ordo Missae prepared by the experts of the Consilium ad exequendam Constitutionem de Sacra Liturgia, and after lengthy prayer and reflection, we feel it to be our bounden duty in the sight of God and towards Your Holiness, to put before you the following considerations:

1. The accompanying critical study of the Novus Ordo Missae, the work of a group of theologians, liturgists and pastors of souls, shows quite clearly in spite of its brevity that if we consider the innovations implied or taken for granted which may of course be evaluated in different ways, the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The "canons" of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery.

2. The pastoral reasons adduced to support such a grave break with tradition, even if such reasons could be regarded as holding good in the face of doctrinal considerations, do not seem to us sufficient. The innovations in the Novus Ordo and the fact that all that is of perennial value finds only a minor place, if it subsists at all, could well turn into a certainty the suspicions already prevalent, alas, in many circles, that truths which have always been believed by the Christian people, can be changed or ignored without infidelity to that sacred deposit of doctrine to which the Catholic faith is bound for ever. Recent reforms have amply demonstrated that fresh changes in the liturgy could lead to nothing but complete bewilderment on the part of the faithful who are already showing signs of restiveness and of an indubitable lessening of faith.

Amongst the best of the clergy the practical result is an agonising crisis of conscience of which innumerable instances come tour notice daily.

3. We are certain that these considerations, which can only reach Your Holiness by the living voice of both shepherds and flock, cannot but find an echo in Your paternal heart, always so profoundly solicitous for the spiritual needs of the children of the Church. It has always been the case that when a law meant for the good of subjects proves to be on the contrary harmful, those subjects have the right, nay the duty of asking with filial trust for the abrogation of that law.

Therefore we most earnestly beseech Your Holiness, at a time of such painful divisions and ever-increasing perils for the purity of the Faith and the unity of the church, lamented by You our common Father, not to deprive us of the possibility of continuing to have recourse to the fruitful integrity of that Missale Romanum of St. Pius V, so highly praised by Your Holiness and so deeply loved and venerated by the whole Catholic world.
"

http://www.fisheaters.com/ottavianiintervention.html

 

The change itself was indeed a revolutionary change. And very bad timing imo. I agree it was a mistake. But some clergy and many of the flock were already losing the Faith, long before the new Mass. H.E. hints at this this twice in the text above.

So, imo, the Mass is just one mistake of many. If it was the intention of the Council to “bring the Church up to date” and meet the challenge of a rapidly changing society that was tipping the balance toward immoral behavior, then it should have fought the battle from the pulpit.

Fighting the challenge of society's influence on our youth with revolutionary changes has proven fruitless. Not just in the Liturgy, but in the errors of modern interpretations of Doctrine.

I really feel it has gone a bit too far. The voice of the traditionalist clergy has been heard long enough. There are obviously many in the Hierarchy that see the writing on the wall. It's a mess.

So, will the phasing out of the NO solve anything without the right catechesis ?  What if the Pope were to call H.E. Fellay and asks, "OK, what do you want me to do"  , and then does it ? Commands and decrees it. All of it.

Being the Church is now world wide for the most part, and seeing as though some Bishops think collegiality makes themselves something they are not, how would all of this make any difference ? Unless the priests get down to business, and start building Faith from the pulpit, in the manner they ought, the return to the Gregorian Rite exclusively will not bring us out of crisis. If the errors are not denounced from the pulpit, or continue to be spread by the priest's own version of the "spirit of VII", then the flock are going to walk out of Mass the same lukewarm, ignorant, or confused, catholic they were when they walked in.

The right priest in an No parish will build more faith than a liberal priest will in an OF parish. Not many liberal priests are praying the EF, but if the NO were phased out, they would become the rule initially, not the exception.

So my view is, at this point, is that it is all in the hands of the young priests now. They are the only ones that can fix the mess. If the traditionalist clergy want to see a return to Tradition, then it all has to start with the seminaries. And that's what they do in their own.

Cleaning house in the Vatican is only symbolic if not done in conjunction with firm resolve to right the seminaries. Out with Merton, in with St Alponsus.

Again, it's not just the Mass. While we are waiting for Rome to move decisively, in the right direction, we need to pray and find ways to put our energy where it's needed. That poor dead horse has been beaten so long, and gotten so old, that we catch ourselves beating on each other instead on the forums.

That shouldn't be part of the fight for Tradition should it ?

Thanks to anyone who weathered my rant, and thanks again for everyones thoughts, especially those who agree with me :D

Seriously though, carry on, I'm reading and learning what I can.


Logged
littleway
Guest
« Reply #21 on: August 22, 2008, 02:16:AM »

Sorry but things like

"In the May 2004 Inside the Vatican Fr. Jean Charles-Roux revealed a conversation with Paul VI: I said, 'For 18 months I have celebrated the new Mass, but I cannot continue. I ordained  to celebrate the old Mass, and I watn to return to it. Will you permit me to do so?, the Pope replied, 'Certainly, I never forbade celebration of the old Mass; I have only offered an alternative'"
 
etc just don't cut it. There's too much of that kind of thing going on in too many Traditional Catholics. There are higher principles, and things like this (some quote from someone somewhere) are way way down in the hierarchy of principles that Catholics should use in their lives. You can't pick and choose which of these esoteric things you'd like to trust in because they fit with your own way of seeing things at a certain point in your life. Knowledge of Fr Jean Charles-Roux's comment, whether it's true or not, isn't necessary knowledge for all Catholics, and should therefore be treated as negligible in the bigger scheme of things. If it wasn't negligible, God would let us know, and not through an internet site. 

And no there's nothing in the NO missal that is "intrinsically evil", reflections about "evil being the absence of good" etc notwithstanding. It's what was done by people who leapt on flaws and omissions in the NO missal that were sometimes evil, and sometimes just mistaken. It'll pass.
Logged
MeaMaximaCulpa
Guest
« Reply #22 on: August 22, 2008, 04:24:AM »

Quote from: Supercertari
This is a very confusing question to start with. Can an inanimate object, such as text on a page be adjudged to be intrinsically evil or good? Is it not the intention of the author, and/or what is "done" with the text which can be ajudged good/evil?


Condoms.  

Let me know if you can think of a way that they can be used for good...
Logged
Archbishop_10K
Guest
« Reply #23 on: August 22, 2008, 04:31:AM »

Quote from: MeaMaximaCulpa
Condoms.  

Let me know if you can think of a way that they can be used for good...

Water balloons.

To seal the air inside a two-liter bottle as yeast converts sweets into alcohol (when you're deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, where it's illegal by those nations' Islamic laws to import alcohol into the country).


Logged
Credo
Member

Posts: 6,513



« Reply #24 on: August 22, 2008, 07:54:AM »

Quote from: Whitey
So, how is the NO Mass itself "intristically evil" ?

In the New Mass the priest genuflects after he has presented the Host to the congregation. In the old Mass he does upon the Consecration. Many have taken the modern practice to imply a subtle endorsement of consubstantiation, as if the congregations assent was necessary for the priests words to take effect.

Quote
The best anyone could do over on CA forum


Please, please do not quote the Catholic Answer forums as an authority in anything.

Quote
was to point to the Preparation of the Gifts, saying the prayer(preparation of the wine) "sounds like" and "is based on" Jewish prayers.


This is true, except the conditional wording should be removed. The preparatory prayer are from Judaism. This should be disturbing to anyone with a sensus catholicus.

From page 181 of Tho. A. Droleskey's GIRM Warfare, 2005:

Paragraph 178 [of the GIRM] deals with what is called in the Novus Ordo the "Liturgy of the Eucharist." It is called the "Mass of the Faithful" in the Traditional Latin Mass. The Offertory Prayers of tradition have been gutted, as I noted in an earlier installment in this series. In fact, the Novus Ordo's much simplified (and sanitized) prayers for the "Preparation of the Gifts" come from Jewish liturgical services. Pope Paul VI desired at some point in the Mass to make some gesture toward the people of the Old Covenant, ignoring the fact that Our Lord superseded the Mosaic Covenant with the New and Eternal Testament.


Logged

I promise not to put anything here which might help us question our mind-forged manacles, inspire us, or help us in any way at all.

N.B.: I will not be posting on this site again until the Christmas octave. Have a good Advent.


gjwalberg
Guest
« Reply #25 on: August 22, 2008, 08:02:AM »

This is a great question, really.  Because in the USA, the biggest problem with the Novus Ordo is the deviations from the actual Mass that are the problem.

But if a person had access to a Latin Novus Ordo, offered ad orientum (am I the only person that thinks "celebrates" is the wrong word?) and tended by a careful priest-- would that me intrensicly bad?  I cannot answer this question, I've heard of such Masses only in legend.

But I am reminded of Matthew 7:16-20, wherein the Sermon on the Mount, Christ warned of false prophets:

Quote from: Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
By their fruits you shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down, and shall be cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits you shall know them.

What is to be gleaned from the Novus Ordo? A failing priesthood.  Wandering laity.  A weak Church.  An atrophying Faith.

By their fruits you shall know them.
 
Is the Novus Ordo inherently evil?  I don't know and I won't claim inerrancy in inherency.
 
But by their fruits you shall know them.
 
This Novus Frui tastes like poision.
Logged
StevusMagnus
Guest
« Reply #26 on: August 22, 2008, 09:54:AM »

Trad Robert Sungenis on the Novus Ordo:

http://www.catholicintl.com/qa/qa.htm#Question%2012%20-%20Should%20I%20Attend%20the%20Novus%20Ordo

R. Sungenis: The word “sacrifice” or its equivalents appear over 10 times in the Novus Ordo. There is no “de-emphasis” on the sacrificial. That is a myth propagated by various people with their own agenda. Don’t believe everything you read. Check it out for yourself. The Novus Ordo Mass is a valid and legitimate Mass that confects the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, and it is worthy of our attendance. What is not worthy of our attendance is when today’s liberals desecrate the Novus Ordo with all their worldly accretions.
 
There is nothing objectively wrong with the Novus Ordo. Those who say it is sacrilegious and blasphemous are themselves blaspheming a Mass that God has allowed to be practiced in the Church by dogmatic order of the supreme pontiff. If you compare the Traditional Mass with the Novus Ordo, side by side, except for a few places, they are almost the same. I’ve done the study on this and can confirm its accuracy. It is not the Mass that is the problem. It is the people who are the problem. It is people who abuse the Novus Ordo, and until the Vatican puts the clamps on these renegades, we will continue to have the same problems. The Catholic Church, for the last 40 years, has been very lax in disciplining its wayward members. Until that happens, no change will occur.
Logged
StevusMagnus
Guest
« Reply #27 on: August 22, 2008, 10:10:AM »

Quote from: PeterII
The question is whether the rubrics of the New Rite diminish the expression of our faith as compared to the previous Roman Rite. The consensus by us is that it does.

Does the consensus opinion of Fish Eaters have any bearing as to whether the Rite is intrinsically evil?

Quote
Deficient by the standard taught by the magisterial authority of the Church. Read Pius XII's encyclical Mediator Dei where he condemns the principle of archeologism and shows how it is reflected in the liturgy:

Quote
But deliberately to introduce new liturgical customs, or to revive obsolete rites inconsistent with existing laws and rubrics, is an irresponsible act which We must condemn...


I did a search and cannot find this sentence anywhere in Mediator Dei. Please tell me which paragraph it comes from. Thanks!

Here is what I found on the Vatican Website:

Quote
Assuredly it is a wise and most laudable thing to return in spirit and affection to the sources of the sacred liturgy. For research in this field of study, by tracing it back to its origins, contributes valuable assistance towards a more thorough and careful investigation of the significance of feast-days, and of the meaning of the texts and sacred ceremonies employed on their occasion. But it is neither wise nor laudable to reduce everything to antiquity by every possible device. Thus, to cite some instances, one would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to its primitive tableform; were he to want black excluded as a color for the liturgical vestments; were he to forbid the use of sacred images and statues in Churches; were he to order the crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings; and lastly were he to disdain and reject polyphonic music or singing in parts, even where it conforms to regulations issued by the Holy See.


Quote
No one can deny that the New Rite is a complete contradiction of the salutary teachings of Pius XII taught with magisterial authority. It is the Anti-Mediator Dei.


The ONLY way in which the NO goes against what Pius XII said here was that the  altar is now in the form of a table. What he meant by "tableform" and what the Latin translates exactly to, I have no idea.

Are you sayng that having the altar being in the form of a table is enough to make the NO Mass intrinsically evil?
Logged
gjwalberg
Guest
« Reply #28 on: August 22, 2008, 10:12:AM »

Quote from: Sungenis
If you compare the Traditional Mass with the Novus Ordo, side by side, except for a few places, they are almost the same.

Presuming you get EP1 and disregard things like the propers, this is not entirely incorrect.  But good luck getting a Novus Ordo without EP2 (snore) or EP3 (snore).
Logged
Supercertari
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: ENFP
Posts: 220



« Reply #29 on: August 22, 2008, 10:37:AM »

Quote from: Credo
In the New Mass the priest genuflects after he has presented the Host to the congregation. In the old Mass he does upon the Consecration. Many have taken the modern practice to imply a subtle endorsement of consubstantiation, as if the congregations assent was necessary for the priests words to take effect.

I have certainly been blessed that I have only once or twice experienced the excesses of novelty in the Mass which it seems our american friends have experienced as the norm. I have never taken the priest's genuflection as an endorsement of consubtantiation. I have always seen the elevation of the host and the chalice as the "lifting up" of the sacrifice to the Father followed immediately by the priest reverencing the sacred species in his genuflections.

Logged

"deprecans supercertari semel traditæ sanctis fidei."
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 41
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC