Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 20, 2013, 03:58:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 
Author Topic: Latin accentuation of Hebrew names.  (Read 1700 times)
Texican
Если не я, то кто?
Member

Gender: Male
Location: here. there. everywhere!
Personality type: studený
Posts: 9,505


Déu, força, i honor


« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2009, 03:21:PM »



According to many studies, Korean is harder than Mandarin Smile

I don't concur with those studies.
Logged

Rosarium
Guest
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2009, 03:25:PM »

According to many studies, Korean is harder than Mandarin Smile
I don't concur with those studies.

Do you mean "agree"?


Logged
Texican
Если не я, то кто?
Member

Gender: Male
Location: here. there. everywhere!
Personality type: studený
Posts: 9,505


Déu, força, i honor


« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2009, 03:29:PM »

I disagree.  Korean is easier than Mandarin, from what I've been exposed to.  Hangul itself is much easier to remember, as there aren't very many characters to remember. 
Logged

Rosarium
Guest
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2009, 03:35:PM »

I disagree.  Korean is easier than Mandarin, from what I've been exposed to.  Hangul itself is much easier to remember, as there aren't very many characters to remember. 

I mean't to replace "concur" because that doesn't make sense in that context. Concur does not mean the same thing as agree.

I don't know about writing systems being compared. The study was done for courses for speaking and writing it  and they all seemed to say Korean was the hardest.

Either way, all such writing systems are confusing and I've never studied one (although I know a few Kanji characters) so I'll take a person's word who did study them.
Logged
MagisterMusicae
Resident Contrarian
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 2,221



« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2009, 07:00:PM »

The answer is in Friday Compline. I saw it while singing Compline last night.

The second psalm in Friday Compline has the final sequence of notes falling right on Aaron. The SSPX's Officium Divinum and the Liber Usualis 1962 both show Aaron which would indicate that the double 'a' is pronounced just as the double 'i' is pronounced. Thus it would be ah-ahron. Pronounced properly and with proper speed, however, there won't be much of a separation, so it may end up sounding like an extremely long single vowel in recitation.
Logged


aquinas138
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,599



« Reply #25 on: August 29, 2009, 09:59:PM »

The answer is in Friday Compline. I saw it while singing Compline last night.

The second psalm in Friday Compline has the final sequence of notes falling right on Aaron. The SSPX's Officium Divinum and the Liber Usualis 1962 both show Aaron which would indicate that the double 'a' is pronounced just as the double 'i' is pronounced. Thus it would be ah-ahron. Pronounced properly and with proper speed, however, there won't be much of a separation, so it may end up sounding like an extremely long single vowel in recitation.

Gratias ago, Magister!
Logged

Sicut canis qui revertitur ad vomitum suum, sic imprudens qui iterat stultitiam suam. (Prov. 26:11)

Esse nihil dicis quidquid petis, inprobe Cinna:
si nil, Cinna, petis, nil tibi, Cinna, nego. (Martial 3.61)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC