Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
July 25, 2014, 02:20:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

News: Gold walks into a bar. The bartender yells "AU! Get out!"
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
 
Author Topic: Empire State building will not honor Mother Theresa  (Read 2362 times)
Petertherock
Greatest of all sinners
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 9,976



WWW
« on: June 10, 2010, 12:07:PM »

This is absolutely incredible. They will honor Mariah Carey and Mao but not Mother Theresa???

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/09/empire-state-building-owner-cites-policy-saying-lights-mother-teresas-birthday/

Empire State Building: No Lights for Mother Teresa

NEW YORK — When the Empire State Building lights up, reaching 102 stories into the Manhattan sky, people lift their eyes and guess what that night's colors might mean — a holiday, a charitable cause, maybe a Yankees win or a birthday.

But sometimes, color turns to controversy.

Tens of thousands of people are in an uproar about the building owner's refusal to light New York City's tallest skyscraper in blue and white to honor Mother Teresa in August on what would be her 100th birthday.

"The Empire State Building celebrates many cultures and causes in the world community with iconic lightings, and has a tradition of lightings for the religious holidays of Easter, Eid al Fitr (marking the end of Ramadan), Hanukkah, and Christmas," owner Anthony E. Malkin said in a statement Wednesday.

But the real estate mogul said the privately owned building "has a specific policy against any other lighting for religious figures or requests by religions and religious organizations."

The lay advocacy group Catholic League, which requested the lights for Mother Teresa, countered that individual religious figures have, in fact, been posthumously honored at the Empire State Building: Cardinal John O'Connor in 2000, with the red and white colors of his position; Pope John Paul II in 2005, with the tower lights symbolically extinguished; and famed Baptist preacher Martin Luther King Jr. with red, black and green.

An e-mail sent to Malkin spokesman Daniel Hernandez Lyon asking about religious figures being honored was not answered Wednesday.

The League first asked for the lights in February and was denied.

Anyone can apply to have the building illuminated for what's dear to them. But the privately owned landmark considers selection "a privilege, not an entitlement," according to the website with the application form.

Applications are evaluated by the Empire State Building Co., which says online that decisions are made "at the sole discretion of the ownership and management
."

More than 40,000 people have signed a petition in support of the special lights for Mother Teresa.

Cindy Caprio, an aspiring young actor who works as a hostess at a bar facing the Empire State Building, says she spends her night shift at the door greeting guests — and seeing the colors above her change daily.

"I don't always know what the colors mean, but I look up every day, and I love it," she said Wednesday. "I can usually figure it out for the Fourth of July or the Yankees. And I sometimes guess right."

And when she goes home to Hoboken, N.J., across the river, she can still see the Empire State Building, glowing from afar.

On Wednesday afternoon, New York City Council members voiced their disagreement with what they see as a snub of the ethnic Albanian nun who worked for the poor and the sick while living in India. She died in 1997 and was beatified by the Roman Catholic Church — a step toward possible sainthood.

"I just think it's a really wrong-headed decision that (Malkin) has made," City Council Speaker Christine Quinn said.

"I don't think this is about religion," Quinn said. "Mother Teresa was a nun, obviously, but she was much more than that; she was a Nobel Prize winner ... who inspired people of all religions."

Quinn was backed by City Councilman Peter Vallone Jr., who said "the only person who could forgive the Empire State Building for this boneheaded decision would be Mother Teresa."

League President Bill Donohue said Malkin's policy "is being made up on the run," but the building owner is "not going to get away with it."

The League is applying for a permit to protest at the foot of the Empire State Building on Aug. 26, Mother Teresa's birthday, hoping to fill West 34th Street from Fifth to Sixth avenues.

Until then, the building will keep a tradition started in 1964 of flooding its highest stories with light from sunset to midnight, using computerized LEDs — light-emitting diodes — that can produce millions of colors and patterns.

Decades ago, only nine colors were used, with maintenance workers walking on parapets to hand-install colored lenses on floodlights.

Today's lights are controlled from a computer console, but the magic remains.

Depending on the season, it's blue and white for Hanukkah, red and green for December, yellow and white for spring, pink and white for breast cancer awareness.

Last year, the building was bathed in red and yellow — the colors of communist China — to mark the 60th anniversary of its founding. That decision created a controversy that matches the current one.

When Frank Sinatra turned 80, the Empire lavished Ol' Blue Eyes with blue light.

Logged

Darryl
Ut In Omnibus Glorificetur Deus

"Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ." -St. Athanasius
The_Harlequin_King
Protector of the Internet!
Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 9,782



« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2010, 12:51:PM »

I don't know about "absolutely incredible". It's a private building. The Catholic League itself mentioned that the lights were coordinated for Cardinal O'Connor and Pope John Paul II.
Logged

Please read and subscribe to my blog: Modern Medievalism. Applying old-world solutions to new-world problems.



Praying for the dead is important. PM me if you need a cantor for the Requiem Mass of a deceased friend or family member. Have cassock and surplice, will travel. (Will also do weddings for a reasonable price.)
Aquila_Oculus
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 44



« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2010, 06:44:PM »

.... It's a private building...

Exactly.  While it would be cool for them to recognize Mother Teresa, it is a private building and they are not obligated to explain every denial as stated on the application.  While I appreciate Catholic League for their efforts in defending the faith, this is not as clear-cut as they are making it out to be.

I am a bit torn on the issue, but it is a private building and wouldn't it be un-Catholic to force a private company to recognize the said issue?  I mean it's not like this company is publicly bashing the Catholic Church by promoting a misconception of the Faith or an anti-Catholic person.  They simply denied the request to honor Mother Teresa.

If this company is forced to recognize Mother Teresa, doesn't this set the standard for any religious group to bully their way into promoting their own hero?
Logged

"And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

-Matthew 16:18
Lee Timmer
Banned
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: Melancholic, INTJ
Posts: 604


Exite de illa populus meus.


« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2010, 08:46:PM »

Sometimes I think Bill Donohue does more harm than good.This is a rather petty issue for the Catholic League to be concerning itself with. I don't think "any publicity is good publicity" works for someone in Donohue's line of work.
Logged
Rosarium
Guest
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2010, 08:59:PM »

I see no problems here that are unusual.

I also do not see what importance a birthday is to the Church unless it is a feast day or liturgically significant.
Logged


CollegeCatholic
Banned for snarking meanness, disrespect toward the Holy Father, twisting what others say in order to mock them, etc.
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Personality type: ISTJ
Posts: 8,996


Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam


« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2010, 11:35:PM »

Waste of money on good electricity. 
Logged
Petertherock
Greatest of all sinners
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 9,976



WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2010, 11:47:PM »

Personally, I don't see what's so great about a woman who said that people should be better Muslims, be better Hindus, and better Jews. She went to the JPII school of ecumenism.

Logged

Darryl
Ut In Omnibus Glorificetur Deus

"Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ." -St. Athanasius
Aquila_Oculus
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 44



« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2010, 05:28:PM »

Personally, I don't see what's so great about a woman who said that people should be better Muslims, be better Hindus, and better Jews. She went to the JPII school of ecumenism.


So were going to slam the bus on a woman who did amazing wonders in a rat-hole (dying people lying in the streets) of the world because one of her quotes makes her say something she may have not really meant?  I mean, is this one of those instances we take one quote from someone and guide it to mean one thing when the person may have meant something else?  It's not like she wrote books or documents devoted to the idea people should just be better followers of their own religion, and not find the Truth, right?

I think your being overly harsh.
Logged

"And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

-Matthew 16:18
Petertherock
Greatest of all sinners
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 9,976



WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2010, 05:43:PM »

It's more than one quote. There is a whole book about why she shouldn't be called a Saint. Many protestants and Muslims do "good work" in "hellholes" but they are not Saints. I know TIA isn't the best source of information but even a broken clock is right twice a day...Besides, this book which is being reviewed has nothing to do with TIA...

Is Mother Teresa of Calcutta a Saint?

Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D.

    Book review of Mother Teresa: The Case for the Cause by Mark Michael Zima.

Some years ago at a get-together of family and friends, I committed what I soon learned was an almost unpardonable mistake. I questioned the sanctity of Mother Teresa. My objections were based on certain statements she had made that smacked to me of religious indifferentism. For example, in 1997 she told an AP reporter: "Of course I convert. I convert you to be a better Hindu or a better Muslim or a better Protestant. Once you’ve found God, it’s up to you to decide how to worship him" ("Mother Teresa Touched Other Faiths," AP, Sept. 7, 1997).

But those relatives and friends gathered around the dinner table did not want to discuss orthodoxy. “Of course she’s a saint!” an aunt proclaimed with heated indignation. “Look at how she takes care of the poor, even lepers.” Another brought forth as evidence of sanctity her courageous opposition to abortion. Yet another pointed to the indisputable support of John Paul II for her work. And so on.

At the time, I didn’t have at hand the needed facts to counter the gut-reaction justification that rose then – and still rises today – on behalf of the nun the whole world calls “the saint of Calcutta.” Today, I would be able to respond much better, thanks in no small part to a book I recently read by Mr. Mark Michael Zima titled Mother Teresa: The Case for the Cause.

Mother Teresa’s gospel

Mark Zima, a former brother of two religious communities, does not aim to demonize Mother Teresa. He praises her corporal works of mercy, her mission to care for “the poorest of the poor,” to nurse lepers, to save outcasts, to bury the dead. What he questions are her spiritual works of mercy, especially to convert the sinner, to instruct the ignorant and to counsel the doubtful.



Acclaimed for her humanitarian work. But what about her Catholic doctrine?
Nor does Zima deny that persons benefit from some of her words or example. He applauds her pro-life stand and courage to reprimand world leaders on this issue. What he questions is her fidelity to the centuries-old missionary character of the Church, which aimed to bring all men to Jesus Christ and the One Holy Roman Catholic Apostolic Church He founded. In his book, the reader will find not just one or two, but many instances of a different teaching advocated by Mother Teresa: “I convert you to be a better Hindu, a better Catholic, Muslim, Jain or Buddhist” (p. 4). The impression is, of course, that there are many roads to salvation, a belief clearly condemned by the Catholic Church.

Along these same lines, the author cites numerous quotes of Mother Teresa proposing that God can be addressed as Shiva, Allah, Vishnu or Brahma. The important thing, according to her teaching, is not what religion the person belongs to, but whether he or she is a “good” person. For example, she states, “Some call him Allah, some simply God. But we all have to acknowledge that it is he who made us for the greater things: to love and be loved” (pp. 4-5). This, however, is a Liberal and Modernist error condemned by the Syllabus, Pascendi and many other papal teachings before Vatican II.

The contradictions…

Mr. Zima admits that much of what Mother Teresa said is orthodox, citing quotes normally produced by those who passionately defend her orthodoxy. But he points out troubling contradictions in her teaching. For example, she rightly affirmed, “Preach only Christ and Christ crucified.” But in her address to the United Nations in 1985, Mother Teresa told the world something completely different: “No color, no religion, no nationality should come between us. We are all children of God” (p. 6).



Praying at the tomb of Gandhi

Mother Teresa often said that all souls need to be converted, which appears to be good doctrine if one assumes that the conversion is to the Catholic Faith. But, to the contrary, she said that her goal was “to make the Christian the better Christian, the Muslim a better Muslim, and a Hindu a better Hindu.” This echoes the teaching of Mahatma Gandhi and Sri Ramakrishna that all religions are true (pp 29-31). It is not, however, Catholic teaching.

Mother Teresa often stated she wanted to give Jesus to all, that Christ was the way to salvation, which is absolutely true. But at the same time she said non-Catholics could replace the Name of Jesus with God: “You could replace Jesus by God if you are not a Christian” (pp. 79-80). Again, another error condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX and Pascendi of St. Pius X (pp. 71-72).

The ticket for St. Peter


Another baffling contradiction that Mark Zima examines in chapter VII regards Mother Teresa’s repeated claim that “her mission was not to convert.” Mother Teresa and her sisters said they helped the dying to receive the rituals of their various faiths: “for Hindus, water from the Ganges on their lips; for Muslims reading from the Koran; for the rare Christian, the last rites” (p. 142).

At the same time, speaking at the Vatican in 1992 she boasted that all those who died in her shelter in Calcutta had “received the special ticket for St. Peter” (p. 126). That ticket is the name for baptism, well, a baptism of sorts…

According to the foundress of the Missionaries of Charity, the policy was to ask those who were about to die “if they want a blessing by which their sins will be forgiven and they will see God” (p. 127). If they agreed, and apparently most did agree, the sisters would put a wet cloth on the head of the person and quietly say the form of words for Baptism (p. 127).



Questions need to be answered about her inter-confessional "ticket for St. Peter"

There are obvious problems with such procedure. Questions must be asked if this strange procedure is a valid Baptism. First, for a valid Baptism, the water must be applied by sprinkling, immersion or pouring. Does laying a wet cloth on the forehead comply with the rule?

Second, the formula of Baptism should be said aloud in an audible voice, and it is not clear if the sisters did so.

Third, for adults to be properly disposed for Baptism, they should clearly express their desire to embrace the Catholic Faith as the one true faith revealed by God. It is almost certain that this requirement was not fulfilled in the “ticket for St. Peter” administrated by Mother Teresa and her nuns. Clearly, Hindus, Muslims and agnostics who have never been instructed in the Catholic faith and who did not accept Jesus Christ are not properly disposed.

Therefore, Mark Zima concludes, one must question whether Mother Teresa violated the preparation, manner, form and qualifications for Baptism (pp. 129-130). Instead of instructing pagans in the Catholic Faith, did she propagate the faith by deception and covert Sacraments? Such questions should have been carefully examined in a serious canonization process.

Other problematic teachings

The author raises yet other problematic teachings of Mother Teresa, countering them with the teachings of past Popes, Saints and Church Doctors. Let me mention a few:

God as incarnate in every human being. Mother Teresa often spoke of God being incarnate in each of the poor she served. Regarding abortion, she said “When we destroy an unborn child, we destroy God.” In fact, abortion is horrendous because it is a terrible crime, the murder of a child. But, as Mr. Zima points out, only “a pantheist would believe that destroying an unborn child is destroying God” (pp. 54, 88-111).

The nature of man is good. When Mother Teresa insists, as she did, that man is not born evil, it is difficult not to interpret this as a denial of the dogma of original sin (p. 43).

The primacy of conscience. Mother Teresa said that what mattered was that the individual think and believe that his or her way is the only way to God: “Man is free to embrace the religion that gives him peace, joy and love. There is no freedom if a person is not free to choose according to his own conscience” (pp. 32, 168). The relativism of her words are clear: “If the individual thinks and believes that his or her way is the only way to God, then that is their way of salvation” (pp. 74-75).

The wide gate to Heaven. Contrary to the teaching of Our Lord Jesus Christ who warns us that the gate of Heaven is narrow (Mt 7:13-14), Mother Teresa often comforted persons by assuring them that “we will meet all our friends and family members who died before us in Heaven.” Buddhists, Muslims, Protestants – all were “going home to God” (p. 123-125).

Should Mother Teresa be considered a saint?

Was what Mother Teresa said, did and taught regarding the Catholic Faith what has been “believed everywhere, always, and by all (ubique, semper, ab omnibus)? This is the question at the crux of Mark Zima’s book: Should Mother Teresa be canonized?



Receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo in 1979.
Glorified on earth. Is she really glorified in Heaven?


Let me provide a little background on the topic. On Oct. 19, 2003, John Paul II beatified Mother Teresa of Calcutta, who died in 1997. The process leading up to the beatification was the shortest in modern history. Less than two years after her death, he waived the normal five-year waiting period and allowed the immediate opening of her canonization cause. So Zima’s question is timely. Was the process too fast? Should the case be examined more carefully in light of Catholic dogma?

To answer that question, the reader is asked to set aside any emotional attachment to the nun and her work of assisting the poor, and examine her words and actions in light of the constant, unchanging teaching of the Catholic Church. He must objectively ask himself, Can Mother Teresa’s teaching harmonize with the Church Magisterium?

The reader must remember that all the works, words and actions of a candidate to the altars must be shown to be orthodox. Under that light, one quite simply cannot affirm unequivocally that Mother Teresa is a saint.

In his final chapter, Mr. Zima asserts that Catholics have the right and duty, for the love of the Faith, to petition the Congregation for Cause of Saints, asking that Mother Teresa’s cause to be re-examined more carefully and objectively, raising the objections presented in his book. (1) I think it is a good proposal because a very serious matter is at stake in this case. It is the integrity itself of the Catholic Faith.

To canonize Mother Teresa is to fulfill the progressivist desire for a new criterion for making saints. A criterion that, ignoring doctrinal soundness, is based solely on good will and charity toward our fellow man. With her canonization, we would come a step closer to establishing a common list of saints with the other religions, the "common martyrology" coined by John Paul II in the Encyclical Ut Unum Sint (no. 84). What will be next? The rehabilitation of Luther?

To canonize Mother Teresa raises a grave question: Has the Catholic Faith, which cannot change, in fact changed? To accept her teaching is to renounce doctrinal opposition to the false religions. Despite her good works, her words and actions imply the death of militancy and true missionary spirit in the Catholic Church.

I strongly advise reading this important book. It is not only an objective, honest examination of the life and cause of Mother Teresa, but also an invaluable reference work that sets forth the teachings of Saints, Popes and Doctors of the Catholic Church.

http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_025br_MotherTeresa_Zima.htm

Logged

Darryl
Ut In Omnibus Glorificetur Deus

"Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ." -St. Athanasius
Lee Timmer
Banned
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: Melancholic, INTJ
Posts: 604


Exite de illa populus meus.


« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2010, 07:19:PM »

Shame on you, Pete, for not toeing the Company Line.  Fo' Shame
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC