Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 25, 2013, 01:34:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28]
 
Author Topic: Pope Benedict gets it wrong on Bishop Williamson in new book  (Read 13029 times)
Bakuryokuso
Eh
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,935


The gentleman in question


« Reply #270 on: December 03, 2010, 05:31:PM »

The thread will be locked if numbers are chatted about
just a heads up
it's actually darkly humourus in an odd way
buskyao u qouted an sspx priest fine but baas actually talking about the origins and ramifications of such ideology
ie prists or bishops can  nly speak o. Rilkgpus  matters
tht is not a catholic world view it is a secular Masonic one
I will ceed and accept I'm wrong I'd u can shw me where in church history prior to vpooo has thechurch declared itself and her priests ONLY  to speak about religous matters
   

Well, he's free to speak about it, but he's a Bishop, not a historian. In that sense, it's not in his field of expertise. It's like the old adage: if you need a doctor, call a doctor - if you need a plumber, call a plumber - if you need a priest, call a priest. It's not expedient for him to discuss such issues without proper historical qualifications because it does more harm than good in the end.
Logged

"I suppose the greatest reform of our time was that carried out by St Pius X: surpassing anything, however needed, that the Council will achieve." -- JRR Tolkien, letter to his son Michael, 1 November 1963
devotedknuckles
the causes go, true rebels remain
Member

Personality type: incorrigible buffalo
Posts: 20,680



« Reply #271 on: December 03, 2010, 06:48:PM »

True butvhe was asked. Question and he answered what he  believed. The question ubshould ask is why was he asked that question afer an agreement was made that hebwoukd not be?
Also u do not need to Be  an expwrt to have opinions and even voice them on  Any topic. People and bishops do hat all the time. Such is life
considering hw sacred the holohoax os to those who run the show it only follows then that ia in the relm of religion thus Bishops should speak about it to challange exactly what it is and how it has replaced in popular conscousness the incarnation as the central pivot of history in the popular mind of the west.
It's nt about numbers it's not even about the Nazis
it's bigger then that
wake up!
 
Logged

This is the journey
from which, for me there shall be no return
wholly drenched
is the pine tree of  tears
-Yoshida Shoin
Joseph11
Member

Posts: 996



« Reply #272 on: December 03, 2010, 10:14:PM »

True butvhe was asked. Question and he answered what he  believed. The question ubshould ask is why was he asked that question afer an agreement was made that hebwoukd not be?
Also u do not need to Be  an expwrt to have opinions and even voice them on  Any topic. People and bishops do hat all the time. Such is life
considering hw sacred the holohoax os to those who run the show it only follows then that ia in the relm of religion thus Bishops should speak about it to challange exactly what it is and how it has replaced in popular conscousness the incarnation as the central pivot of history in the popular mind of the west.
It's nt about numbers it's not even about the Nazis
it's bigger then that
wake up!
 


Indeed.  The devil used to be the only bogeyman people in this civilization took seriously.  They were right, of course, because he's the only one you really need to worry about in the end...

Hitler is actually a replacement bogeyman.  It's so dumb too.

I mean, the guy is probably very dead right now...

But how do most people react to Hitler vs. the devil?

Hitler gives them a case of the visceral creeps, and hatred, and consternation of various other sorts.

When people hear about the devil they either roll their eyes, laugh out loud, giggle, snicker, smile knowingly to one another that he's just a myth, or get entertained by horror sequences thrown at them by Holywood (typo intended), or they treat the devil as a mere curiosity.

But Hitler and those Nazis, man, they were pure evil.  Good thing we can read about how evil they were in history books and that they're not around anymore, cuz man, that was just as evil as it gets... Tin Foil Hat
Logged
tvespasian
Member

Posts: 7


« Reply #273 on: December 17, 2010, 03:37:PM »

While I don't deny that Hitler and the NSDAP turned out to be the second worst evil participants in WWII, Joseph Vissarionovich "Stalin" and Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, the so-called "saviours of democracy" were very clearly WORSE, by any criterion used against Hitler and the Nazis, except of course the ONE criterion that serves world jewry today, using Hitler as a secular satan, with their mythical "6 million" as their substitute for Christ crucified!  To wit, any moron shitting about the nazis as "pure evil" is either doing so out of historic ignorance, at best, or active and willing service of the diabolic agenda aforementioned.
Logged
devotedknuckles
the causes go, true rebels remain
Member

Personality type: incorrigible buffalo
Posts: 20,680



« Reply #274 on: December 17, 2010, 09:00:PM »

Well said
sip sip
Logged

This is the journey
from which, for me there shall be no return
wholly drenched
is the pine tree of  tears
-Yoshida Shoin


Bakuryokuso
Eh
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,935


The gentleman in question


« Reply #275 on: December 18, 2010, 11:23:AM »

While I don't deny that Hitler and the NSDAP turned out to be the second worst evil participants in WWII, Joseph Vissarionovich "Stalin" and Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, the so-called "saviours of democracy" were very clearly WORSE, by any criterion used against Hitler and the Nazis, except of course the ONE criterion that serves world jewry today, using Hitler as a secular satan, with their mythical "6 million" as their substitute for Christ crucified!  To wit, any moron shitting about the nazis as "pure evil" is either doing so out of historic ignorance, at best, or active and willing service of the diabolic agenda aforementioned.

Churchill is worse than Hitler? I don't recall Churchill outlawing Catholicism in his country or executing priests. Saint Maximiliam Kolbe anyone?
Logged

"I suppose the greatest reform of our time was that carried out by St Pius X: surpassing anything, however needed, that the Council will achieve." -- JRR Tolkien, letter to his son Michael, 1 November 1963
devotedknuckles
the causes go, true rebels remain
Member

Personality type: incorrigible buffalo
Posts: 20,680



« Reply #276 on: December 18, 2010, 02:32:PM »

WelL to the Irish he sure was  worse. That said let's not derail the thread which seemed to be a purpose move to IMHO
 
Logged

This is the journey
from which, for me there shall be no return
wholly drenched
is the pine tree of  tears
-Yoshida Shoin
Telemaque
Member

Posts: 1,155


« Reply #277 on: December 18, 2010, 02:40:PM »

The man simply stated a historical opinion.  The treatment he has received for it has resulted in absolutely disgraceful conduct by the SSPX and in the Vatican, pandering to the enemies of the Church.
Logged

Bakuryokuso
Eh
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,935


The gentleman in question


« Reply #278 on: December 18, 2010, 02:42:PM »

WelL to the Irish he sure was  worse. That said let's not derail the thread which seemed to be a purpose move to IMHO
 

fair enough mate sip sip
Logged

"I suppose the greatest reform of our time was that carried out by St Pius X: surpassing anything, however needed, that the Council will achieve." -- JRR Tolkien, letter to his son Michael, 1 November 1963
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28]
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC