Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 22, 2013, 03:26:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
 
Author Topic: Catholic Answers Forum bans papal teachings on Freemasonry  (Read 2552 times)
Telemaque
Member

Posts: 1,155


« on: December 20, 2010, 09:11:AM »

Can a forum that bans the posting and discussion of magisterium really be Catholic?

http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=513986

The phony excuse given is that some posters suggest it's okay to join freemasonry.  Why not ban those posters and give infractions to them?

Saying that Catholic teachings should be censored to prevent people from disagreeing with them is clearly a phony excuse!

Logged

Rosarium
Guest
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2010, 09:15:AM »

This is this forum.

Logged
Telemaque
Member

Posts: 1,155


« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2010, 09:31:AM »

This is this forum.



What happens on other Catholic forums does matter.
Logged

Rosarium
Guest
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2010, 09:41:AM »

This is this forum.



What happens on other Catholic forums does matter.

Quote from: The Rules
11 Specific Rules
 
Don't be shy! Please participate; that's what will keep the board alive. Read an interesting article? Post it! See a movie? Write a review or talk about it in the Art and Entertainment forum! Want to read a work of fiction and talk about it with others? Start a book club! Want to read St. Augustine's "City of God" with people? Ask someone to start a formal study -- or start one yourself if you have the expertise! Got a joke? Tell it in the Pig Roast forum! Learn something recently? Teach it! Find an interesting video at Youtube or Google? Embed it to share with others!
      
Don't just post URLs with no summaries, no effort at explaining what the URLs link to. Preferred is the posting of entire articles (or, if they're extremely long, their relevant parts) -- and especially preferred is the posting of articles accompanied by some of your own commentary. It makes things much more interesting and stimulates responses! And please cite sources!
   
Use descriptive titles in your subject lines. For ex., if you have a question about Confession, instead of writing "Question" for your subject line, write "Question about Confession."
 
Don't type in ALL CAPS, especially in subject lines. Use capital letters for emphasis. Don't use smilies/emoticons in subject lines.
  
If you post a link to a PDF file, warn people that it is, indeed a PDF file. Please. Oh, please.
 
Don't dis other forums here or bring to this place complaints about how other web forums are run.
 
Don't bump threads unless, and only unless, it is to bring to others' attention something that is timely or in some other way relevant. If you post something and no one responds, then no one wants to talk about your post, apparently.
   
When replying to a post, try to eliminate as much as possible any excess, unecessary quoting. If you are only responding to one line in someone's long post, just quote that one line. Avoid "me too" type replies.
   
Take personal sniping to e-mail or PMs. No one wants to hear it. Grow up and try to handle things yourself. We dislike "mommified" boards and don't want to run one.
    
This board is an English language-based board. Don't post things in other languages unless you provide translations, are asking for translations of Church-related materials, are attempting to show a primary source in a contentious issue, are doing so ordinately in an otherwise English post, or are posting things in Latin in an appropriate way and in the appropriate place. If for such a good reason you need to post in a non-English language, indicate so in your subject line, e.g.: Pope's Letter to Artists (Spanish)
 
Note, though, that there are many people who post here whose first language isn't English; we have members whose first language is French, German, Dutch, Polish, etc. So if you come across a misspelled word, the occasional bit of bad grammar, an apparent insult, etc., make sure the issue isn't a matter of someone trying to express himself in a language he doesn't think in.
 
Don't set up different usernames. One account per person.

There is a reason why people are posting here. While people may post on many forums, it can be safely assumed that those who do take part on this forum do so with the intent of belong to this forum, not others.

This forum and that are not the Church. I'm sure a person could post all sorts of things about this forum too.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2010, 09:43:AM by Rosarium » Logged
devotedknuckles
the causes go, true rebels remain
Member

Personality type: incorrigible buffalo
Posts: 20,680



« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2010, 09:45:AM »

Well to be fair Thai isn't he first thrad about other forums angel queen has been discused many times here. I don't hink it's breaking dukes discussing other forums   policiesnif it's sencere. After all a forum claiming to be cathokic banning church teaching regarding a topic seems to be a bit rich IMHO
anyhoo that's my o2
their are rules the. Their are spirit of the rules but o course rosarium can't get that it's a subtle but importance difference
 
Logged

This is the journey
from which, for me there shall be no return
wholly drenched
is the pine tree of  tears
-Yoshida Shoin


Telemaque
Member

Posts: 1,155


« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2010, 10:03:AM »

Well to be fair Thai isn't he first thrad about other forums angel queen has been discused many times here. I don't hink it's breaking dukes discussing other forums   policiesnif it's sencere. After all a forum claiming to be cathokic banning church teaching regarding a topic seems to be a bit rich IMHO
anyhoo that's my o2
their are rules the. Their are spirit of the rules but o course rosarium can't get that it's a subtle but importance difference
 

What are his motivations for not wanting to expose betrayal of the Catholic Church of a forum.  Because refusing to allow Magisterium to be mentioned and defended on a forum is clearly a betrayal of the Church.
Logged

QuisUtDeus
Guest
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2010, 10:42:AM »

What are his motivations for not wanting to expose betrayal of the Catholic Church of a forum.  Because refusing to allow Magisterium to be mentioned and defended on a forum is clearly a betrayal of the Church.

I'm just wondering what the news flash is considering it's CAF.  Cite almost anything written before V2 there and they get their panties in a bunch and you're marked.
Logged
Telemaque
Member

Posts: 1,155


« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2010, 11:09:AM »

What are his motivations for not wanting to expose betrayal of the Catholic Church of a forum.  Because refusing to allow Magisterium to be mentioned and defended on a forum is clearly a betrayal of the Church.

I'm just wondering what the news flash is considering it's CAF.  Cite almost anything written before V2 there and they get their panties in a bunch and you're marked.

It is still shocking to me that they are willing to censor papal magisterium there.  Isn't that sort of an implicit admission that they reject it?
Logged

QuisUtDeus
Guest
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2010, 12:04:PM »

What are his motivations for not wanting to expose betrayal of the Catholic Church of a forum.  Because refusing to allow Magisterium to be mentioned and defended on a forum is clearly a betrayal of the Church.

I'm just wondering what the news flash is considering it's CAF.  Cite almost anything written before V2 there and they get their panties in a bunch and you're marked.

It is still shocking to me that they are willing to censor papal magisterium there.  Isn't that sort of an implicit admission that they reject it?

The one thing I've learned over the years about Neo-Catholics is that they're hypocrites.  They claim trads pick and choose what they want to hear, yet they do it in spades.  If they gave a flying circus about the "old stuff" they would be fighting for traditional Catholicism even as they fought for the "reform-of-the-reform", but they don't.  Really, they just want their version of the reform, but they still want the reform, not tradition.  For all the lip service they pay, the reality is traditional Catholicism is an enemy to them because it isn't their worldview.  Maybe it's not their conscious enemy, but at least in effect it is.

And, they're right.  Traditional Catholics don't want a reform-of-the-reform, we want an abrogation of the reform and a universal return to tradition.  They may not mind so much a TLM in a ghetto somewhere, but they don't want that to be the norm.  They want EWTN to be the norm.  We (trads and Neo-Catholics) might have the same goal more or less - orthodoxy - and I don't doubt their love for the Church as I do with Modernists and Liberals, but the end results we desire are orthogonal to each other.

The problem with their position is a lot of orthodoxy is rooted in tradition, so as they get rid of tradition in their "reform", so goes the orthodoxy.  I'm not saying they'll be outright heretics or even heretics at all, but they will do things like not talk about the "old stuff" or call it "discipline and changeable" or play it down or reinterpret it.  They've done it with Church teachings on heretics and Jewry, they're doing it with Freemasonry, and they'll continue to do it as they try to make an orthodox Church that doesn't offend.

In other words, it seems to me like they're selling out.

Obviously, this is just my personal opinion, and doesn't apply to every "Neo-Catholic" everywhere.  But it sure seems to fit some of their apologists, etc.
Logged
cgraye
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Location: Maryland, United States of America
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 7,061



« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2010, 12:30:PM »

According the sticky there, discussion of Freemasonry was banned there because it was resulting in violations of the rules.  Not because people were defending Freemasonry, but because they were promoting it.
Logged

Chris
Pages: [1] 2
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC