Question about modesty

[DeoDuce]

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

[Mithrandylan]

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

I speak for all of men when I say it's ok if a girls shins aren't covered. 

[DeoDuce]

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

I speak for all of men when I say it's ok if a girls shins aren't covered. 

This answers nothing.

[verenaerin]

You wear pants to your ankles because that is the fashion of today. If this were another culture, or another time period would you be able to claim the same thing? No. Your disordered way of thinking is not the product of women wearing sleeveless shirts or skirts that show shins.

[DeoDuce]

You wear pants to your ankles because that is the fashion of today. If this were another culture, or another time period would you be able to claim the same thing? No. Your disordered way of thinking is not the product of women wearing sleeveless shirts or skirts that show shins.

This answers nothing.

[Someone1776]

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

You mean the double standard where it's okay for a trad man to wear shorts and a polo shirt, but it's a sin for a trad woman to expose her arms or skins?

Just because you have decided to wear long sleeve shirts during the heat of summer doesn't mean I am going to. 

[Someone1776]

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

I speak for all of men when I say it's ok if a girls shins aren't covered. 

I think I am going to start up a pornographic magazine for trad men. Here is my first pornographic image:



I am going to be a rich man!

[verenaerin]

DD,

Because I don't see sleeveless shirts as immodest you assume I approve of Daisy Dukes? Please give me an example of where I lead you to believe this.  

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

[DeoDuce]

I have no problem with wearing shirts which cover my collar bone and up to my elbows, and I always wear pants.  I don't know why it's difficult for women to wear clothing with similar coverage.

I will take your example and bring out my pants to wear.

There's that special brand of sarcasm unique to FE again.

Obviously "clothing with similar coverage" means "ankle-length skirt."  Now why is it so hard for women to have their legs completely covered, upper arms completely covered, and chests covered up to the neck if it's easy enough for men?  Is it sexy to show off one's shins now?

If seeing a girls shins is going to send you into a lustful frenzy that's your problem and you should seek spiritual direction.   

I think I would be directed to accept girls in Daisy Dukes, given the situation here.

But my point is to try to find an explanation for the double standard.

You mean the double standard where it's okay for a trad man to wear shorts and a polo shirt, but it's a sin for a trad woman to expose her arms or skins?

Just because you have decided to wear long sleeve shirts during the heat of summer doesn't mean I am going to. 

That's not it either.

Because I don't see sleeveless shirts as immodest you assume I approve of Daisy Dukes? Please give me an example of where I lead you to believe this. 

I didn't say that you did.

[verenaerin]

DD

Then who was that comment directed towards?