Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 19, 2013, 11:02:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum > Church > Sacred Scripture & Church Documents > Question about modesty
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
 
Author Topic: Question about modesty  (Read 4309 times)
DeoDuce
Guest
« Reply #50 on: September 30, 2011, 09:49:PM »
The local situation.
Logged
verenaerin
Member

Posts: 2,501
« Reply #51 on: September 30, 2011, 09:52:PM »
So I say sleeveless and you think Daisy Dukes, and I am the one with the problem?
Logged
I cough for my own amusement...

I fight for the rights of the sleeveless!
DeoDuce
Guest
« Reply #52 on: September 30, 2011, 09:57:PM »
Quote from: verenaerin
So I say sleeveless and you think Daisy Dukes, and I am the one with the problem?

That comment had nothing to do with you.
Logged
verenaerin
Member

Posts: 2,501
« Reply #53 on: September 30, 2011, 10:03:PM »
OK, so shins and sleeveless shirts are brought up. SCG and I both gave examples of what we were talking about. Each example is tasteful and modest. Then you bring up Daisy Dukes, which are neither. Why would you think that? Is it the fault of the examples we gave or your own mind? You don't have to answer, I am just pointing this out. We are talking about modest expressions of clothing and you brought up something gross.
Logged
I cough for my own amusement...

I fight for the rights of the sleeveless!
Mithrandylan
Banned for promoting sedevacantism
Regular

Gender: Male
Location: Tundra
Personality type: Melancholy- a point below phlegmatic
Posts: 10,141


Divínum auxílium ✝ maneat semper nobíscum.
« Reply #54 on: September 30, 2011, 10:06:PM »
Quote from: verenaerin
OK, so shins and sleeveless shirts are brought up. SCG and I both gave examples of what we were talking about. Each example is tasteful and modest. Then you bring up Daisy Dukes, which are neither. Why would you think that? Is it the fault of the examples we gave or your own mind? You don't have to answer, I am just pointing this out. We are talking about modest expressions of clothing and you brought up something gross.

I think Deoduce may be Servire Deo
Logged


Someone1776
"The Derailer"
Member

Posts: 10,405


Neo-Candylander
« Reply #55 on: September 30, 2011, 10:13:PM »
Quote from: Mithrandylan
Quote from: verenaerin
OK, so shins and sleeveless shirts are brought up. SCG and I both gave examples of what we were talking about. Each example is tasteful and modest. Then you bring up Daisy Dukes, which are neither. Why would you think that? Is it the fault of the examples we gave or your own mind? You don't have to answer, I am just pointing this out. We are talking about modest expressions of clothing and you brought up something gross.

I think Deoduce may be Servire Deo

LOL
Logged
"Christianity lies in achieving greatness in the face of the world's hatred." - Saint Ignatius of Antioch
DeoDuce
Guest
« Reply #56 on: September 30, 2011, 10:15:PM »
Quote from: verenaerin
OK, so shins and sleeveless shirts are brought up. SCG and I both gave examples of what we were talking about. Each example is tasteful and modest. Then you bring up Daisy Dukes, which are neither. Why would you think that? Is it the fault of the examples we gave or your own mind? You don't have to answer, I am just pointing this out. We are talking about modest expressions of clothing and you brought up something gross.

All I asked was why it's much harder for women to cover up as much as men typically do.  All of this runaround I was getting was unnecessary.

Someone suggested that I get spiritual direction if shins turn me on, and I replied that I thought I'd probably be directed to accept women in Daisy Dukes.
Logged
Someone1776
"The Derailer"
Member

Posts: 10,405


Neo-Candylander
« Reply #57 on: September 30, 2011, 10:22:PM »
Quote from: DeoDuce

Someone suggested that I get spiritual direction if shins turn me on, and I replied that I thought I'd probably be directed to accept women in Daisy Dukes.

You don't know that. Go talk to a traditional priest. He will be able to offer much better spiritual advice than us. We're just idiots with keyboards. 
Logged
"Christianity lies in achieving greatness in the face of the world's hatred." - Saint Ignatius of Antioch
DeoDuce
Guest
« Reply #58 on: September 30, 2011, 10:26:PM »
Quote from: Someone1776
Quote from: DeoDuce

Someone suggested that I get spiritual direction if shins turn me on, and I replied that I thought I'd probably be directed to accept women in Daisy Dukes.

You don't know that. Go talk to a traditional priest. He will be able to offer much better spiritual advice than us. We're just idiots with keyboards. 

Like I said, given the situation here (locally), that's not very possible.
Logged
verenaerin
Member

Posts: 2,501
« Reply #59 on: September 30, 2011, 10:27:PM »
Quote from: DeoDuce
Quote from: verenaerin
OK, so shins and sleeveless shirts are brought up. SCG and I both gave examples of what we were talking about. Each example is tasteful and modest. Then you bring up Daisy Dukes, which are neither. Why would you think that? Is it the fault of the examples we gave or your own mind? You don't have to answer, I am just pointing this out. We are talking about modest expressions of clothing and you brought up something gross.

All I asked was why it's much harder for women to cover up as much as men typically do.  All of this runaround I was getting was unnecessary.

Someone suggested that I get spiritual direction if shins turn me on, and I replied that I thought I'd probably be directed to accept women in Daisy Dukes.

If I am dressing modestly, why should I change  to fit your parameters?

And most trad women I know do cover up as much as the typical man does, if not more.
Logged
I cough for my own amusement...

I fight for the rights of the sleeveless!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC