Rubrical differences between High Anglican Mass and Tridentine

[Someone1776]

The local Anglo-Catholic Church celebrates the 1962 missal.according to proper rubrics once a month. I gather they are odd in doing that, but in that case I gather there would be no difference other than validity. 

[jovan66102]

Back in my anglican days we always used the book of common prayer 1928 edition which has nothing to do with the Mass. Although frankly its a more aesthetically pleasing liturgy than the Novus Ordo. But my Vicar was very High Church.

Actually, I've seen and served at celebrations using the '28 BCP that were hard to tell apart from an Anglican Missal 'Tridentine'. All the propers, Introit, etc., can be used as 'hymns', etc. Again, depends a lot on the cleric. My foster father, a graduate of Nashotah House Seminary (a bastion of Anglo-Catholicism) conformed the BCP as closely as possible to the Roman Mass. Our 'bishop' on the other hand simply 'read the black and did the red' as laid out in it. Serving both at various times was quite a contrast.

[Phillipus Iacobus]

The Anglicans don't follow the 1955 Pius XII changes, correct?

Varies with the cleric. There is/was an Anglican book called 'The Ritual Reason Why' that came out with a new edition every time Rome changed the Rubrics. In fact, I remember seeing an edition published shortly after HH Pius XII allowed evening Masses. It said, 'In view of the Holy Father's recent decision, evening Masses can no longer be considered unCatholic'! (They had been common for quit some time in 'Low Church' Parishes.)

Even Protestants listen when the Pope speaks, as Bishop Williamson said. The Syllabus, Apostolicae Curae, now Pope Pius XII's reforms.
I read that the Forward in Faith Anglican group had their services in Latin, ad orientem. Then, when the Novus Ordo came, they promptly changed in imitation.

[The_Harlequin_King]

Actually, I've seen and served at celebrations using the '28 BCP that were hard to tell apart from an Anglican Missal 'Tridentine'. All the propers, Introit, etc., can be used as 'hymns', etc. Again, depends a lot on the cleric. My foster father, a graduate of Nashotah House Seminary (a bastion of Anglo-Catholicism) conformed the BCP as closely as possible to the Roman Mass. Our 'bishop' on the other hand simply 'read the black and did the red' as laid out in it. Serving both at various times was quite a contrast.

Indeed. The pastor of my Anglican Use church celebrates using the Book of Divine Worship (an adapted form of the 1928 BCP approved by Rome) with a lot of what you might call... Tridentinisms. Pinching the fingers after the consecration, that sort of thing. To the uninitiated, it would seem a heck of a lot like a Tridentine Mass in English.