Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 23, 2013, 01:50:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
 
Author Topic: It seems voting for the GOP may be the wrong move...  (Read 875 times)
Traditional Guy
Peace Be With You
Member

Gender: Male
Location: South Carolina
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 2,277


« on: February 08, 2012, 01:08:PM »

considering that a vote for Gingrich, Santorum, etc. is a vote for war on Iran.

Disturbing news revealed by Pat Buchanan...

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=49360

"Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, said of Iran:
   
'We don't believe they've actually made the decision to go ahead with a nuclear weapon.'
   
Before the hearing, as James Fallows of The Atlantic reports, Clapper released his 'Worldwide Threat Assessment.' It read, 'We do not know ... if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons.'"



"But the IAEA inspectors and LEU are still there.
   
When the alleged plot by a used-car salesman in Texas to hire Mexican cartel criminals to blow up a D.C. restaurant and kill the Saudi ambassador was revealed, Iran denied it emphatically and demanded to interview the alleged mastermind.
   
Moreover, Tehran has yet to retaliate for the assassinations of five of its nuclear scientists and four terror attacks by Jundallah in Sistan-Baluchistan and PJAK, a Kurdish terrorist organization operating out of Iraqi Kurdistan. Iran has alleged Western and Israeli involvement in these attacks."



"And though a U.S. war on Iran would be calamitous for Iran, it would be no cakewalk for Americans, who could become terrorist targets for years in the Gulf, Afghanistan, Baghdad's Green Zone, Lebanon and even here in the USA.
   
Year 2012 is thus shaping up as a war-or-peace election, with Republicans the war party and Democrats the peace-and-diplomacy party.
   
And as the months pass between now and November, this will become clear to the nation."
Logged

"You know when I was 18 I thought my father was pretty dumb. 3 years later I was amazed at how much he learned." Going My Way Smile
verenaerin
Member

Posts: 2,501



« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2012, 01:22:PM »

I am not convinced that the Dems will not choose war either. No matter who wins, I think we will be at war next year. The Repubs will jsut jump into it, they have made that clear. And if, make that IF, the Dems need some pushing (which is hard to believe), then I am sure there will be some act of terrorism against us that will force our hand.

If there is no war, the banks ain't making any money, hence the continual war machine.
Logged

I cough for my own amusement...

I fight for the rights of the sleeveless!
Traditional Guy
Peace Be With You
Member

Gender: Male
Location: South Carolina
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 2,277


« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2012, 01:32:PM »

I am not convinced that the Dems will not choose war either. No matter who wins, I think we will be at war next year. The Repubs will jsut jump into it, they have made that clear. And if, make that IF, the Dems need some pushing (which is hard to believe), then I am sure there will be some act of terrorism against us that will force our hand.

If there is no war, the banks ain't making any money, hence the continual war machine.
You could say banks and you could say a certain ethnic group of people *cough* and a country *cough* that want us to have a war with their enemy.
Logged

"You know when I was 18 I thought my father was pretty dumb. 3 years later I was amazed at how much he learned." Going My Way Smile
Adam Wayne
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Chicago Area
Personality type: INTP
Posts: 3,622


Banned for disrespecting Holy Father/language


« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2012, 06:58:PM »

It's either the wrong move, or the less wrong move.

It certainly is not the right move. Pun intended.
Logged
Crusading Philologist
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: Melancholic-Choleric, INTJ
Posts: 3,412



« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2012, 07:01:PM »

Gingrich < Obama
Logged

Loyalty to a doctrine ends in adherence to the interpretation we give it.
Only loyalty to a person frees us from all self-complacency. - Nicolás Gómez Dávila


Guardian
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 774



« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2012, 10:12:PM »

Gingrich < Obama

Come on....Seriously?

I realize that there's no love here for "neo-cons," but that statement is asinine.
Logged

"Most Holy Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, I offer You the most precious Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in all the tabernacles of the world, in reparation for the sacrileges, outrages and indifference by which He Himself is offended. And through the infinite merits of His most Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I beg of you the conversion of poor sinners."
Traditional Guy
Peace Be With You
Member

Gender: Male
Location: South Carolina
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 2,277


« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2012, 10:14:PM »

Gingrich < Obama

Come on....Seriously?

I realize that there's no love here for "neo-cons," but that statement is asinine.
Yes seriously. The GOP will bankrupt us abroad so there is no difference. The GOP is once again a lackey for neo-cons and Israel.
Logged

"You know when I was 18 I thought my father was pretty dumb. 3 years later I was amazed at how much he learned." Going My Way Smile
Crusading Philologist
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: Melancholic-Choleric, INTJ
Posts: 3,412



« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2012, 10:32:PM »

Gingrich < Obama

Come on....Seriously?

I realize that there's no love here for "neo-cons," but that statement is asinine.

All I know is that I would rather put up with Obama for another four years than be forced to listen to Gingrich's blather for any amount of time.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2012, 10:34:PM by Crusading Philologist » Logged

Loyalty to a doctrine ends in adherence to the interpretation we give it.
Only loyalty to a person frees us from all self-complacency. - Nicolás Gómez Dávila
kingtheoden
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,546



« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2012, 10:41:PM »

I disagree.

Gingrich would be better than Obama in every objective measure.  Better is not necessarily 'good.'  But, Ging will reverse Obamacare, at bare minimum with regards to forced birth control/chemical abortion.

Obama actually argued in favor of infanticide.  Remember that: in IL he was in favor of murdering a completely 100% birthed child.  That's Baal/Moloch level evil man.
Logged
Traditional Guy
Peace Be With You
Member

Gender: Male
Location: South Carolina
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 2,277


« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2012, 10:42:PM »

I disagree.

Gingrich would be better than Obama in every objective measure.  Better is not necessarily 'good.'  But, Ging will reverse Obamacare, at bare minimum with regards to forced birth control/chemical abortion.

Obama actually argued in favor of infanticide.  Remember that: in IL he was in favor of murdering a completely 100% birthed child.  That's Baal/Moloch level evil man.
And what has Gingrich done in regards to abortion? Remember Gingrich was Speaker of the House and really nothing much was done.
Logged

"You know when I was 18 I thought my father was pretty dumb. 3 years later I was amazed at how much he learned." Going My Way Smile
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC