Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 21, 2013, 10:32:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 
Author Topic: Documentary on the SSPX in Sweden  (Read 1002 times)
Old Salt
Yep.
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: melancholic
Posts: 4,902


Sancta Dei Genitrix Ora Pro Nobis.


« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2012, 10:56:PM »

So if Bishop Arborealis is all into ecumenism he should be glad for the "non-Catholic" SSPX seminarian/priest.
Logged

Don't forget to pray for the dead.
GottmitunsAlex
"As the head of the Church, I cannot answer you otherwise. The Jews have not recognized Our Lord; therefore we cannot recognize the Jewish people." Pope St. Pius X
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Personality type: Rational
Posts: 3,905


Hochmeister / Magister generalis


WWW
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2012, 10:59:PM »

No, because this situation made him look like an idiot.
That's why he is angry.


Logged

"Nothing is more miserable than those people who never failed to attack their own salvation. When there was need to observe the Law, they trampled it under foot. Now that the Law has ceased to bind, they obstinately strive to observe it. What could be more pitiable that those who provoke God not only by transgressing the Law but also by keeping it? But at any rate the Jews say that they, too, adore God. God forbid that I say that. No Jew adores God! Who say so? The Son of God say so. For he said: "If you were to know my Father, you would also know me. But you neither know me nor do you know my Father". Could I produce a witness more trustworthy than the Son of God?"  St. John Chrysostom Sunday Homily
Freudentaumel
Member

Posts: 623


« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2012, 01:59:AM »

Not because of Williamson's interview, but rather out of fear of not showing enough "outrage" over Williamson's comments on his comments from Canada back in the late 1980's. 
I only repeated what Bishop Fellay stated.
Logged

"What you make with our Lord?" -Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Freudentaumel
Member

Posts: 623


« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2012, 02:06:AM »

According to the interview someone else posted Father Stenmark went to the diocese first and asked to convert. The told him to stay a Lutheran priest for the sake of ecumenism. It was then someone introduced him to the SSPX.
According to Bishop Arborelius, he was in preparation for reception into the Church but then decided to go to the SSPX and Bishop Arborelius never heard back from him.

I don't know what's true, I just wanted to give the other side of the story.
Logged

"What you make with our Lord?" -Bishop Athanasius Schneider
GottmitunsAlex
"As the head of the Church, I cannot answer you otherwise. The Jews have not recognized Our Lord; therefore we cannot recognize the Jewish people." Pope St. Pius X
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Personality type: Rational
Posts: 3,905


Hochmeister / Magister generalis


WWW
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2012, 02:13:AM »

The [...] Catholic bishop in Sweden some years back rejected Sten Sandmark's desire to be Catholic in favor of ecumenism. How do you view this bishop now that you are Catholic, and what do you think of ecumenism?

Well, about 12 years ago, five people went to the Catholic Bishop saying they wanted to be Catholic. He told us to "hold our horses," and said that we could be "Catholic in our hearts." The highest Catholic authority told us this, and hence we assumed this was a right thing to do. So instead of founding an Augustinian Catholic monastery, these five founded the monastery within the Lutheran Church. Some died, some left, so he was alone until I came almost three years ago.
So the only "support" the bishop gave us in becoming Catholic was sending a Christmas card every year.

That's very sad–to hear that some people wanted to become Catholic but were barred by those who should have welcomed them in. I'm sorry.

We had been studying Catholic doctrine, and we were afraid because we thought that "outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation"–and we did not want to be outside! But it seems that these Catholic bishops today think it's not true. It's a really strange behavior. There are 80,000 Catholics in Sweden; most of them are from the Eastern countries, but with a climate like this, of course there are no conversions.

As a convert, what's your perspective on ecumenism?
Well, there is false ecumenism and real ecumenism; we see false ecumenism all the time. But real ecumenism is to belong to the real Church of Christ founded on St. Peter. To take another view of ecumenism, while we were Lutherans, we invited the Bishop to our house seven times. He did come to the town once, but he did not stop by. Instead, he went to celebrate Mass at the parish of a priest who was the chaplain of the Freemasonic lodge in the town. We warned him about it, but he did not care. He was shaking hands with them and laughing with them.
We said to him afterwards that we thought that the Catholic Church, which has the eternal truths, cannot deal with Freemasons. He said that the Lutheran Church has another opinion, that is that Freemasonry is "okay," and so out of respect for Lutherans, we should obey that guideline of the Catholic bishop.

That's really unbelievable. He put up obstacles to your conversion. What do you think are the biggest obstacles that are put up to the convert these days?
Ecumenism, of course–that you are free to belong to any sect. The Catholic Church has abandoned its supremacy and its teaching " extra ecclesiam nulla salus." It seems as though the Church is doing everything to keep people out of her. They allow adherence to heresy. It used to be that they would fight against the heresy, but now they are friends with the heresy. As a former heretic, it seems so strange to me that the Church wants to be friendly and go down the road of heresy, especially with Vatican II, the ecumenical meeting in Assisi, and the joint declaration on the doctrine of justification with the Lutherans 1999.

What compounds this is our attitude in Sweden. We are very secularized and westernized–we want the newest car, television, movie, etc. There are some movements in Sweden that want spirituality, that want to go back to their "roots," but all over Sweden it is very bad and anti-Christian.

There was an exhibition not too long ago, which the Lutheran Church was paying for, called " Ecce Homo." It was composed of portraits of Christ as naked–terrible, blaspheming pictures. This was terrible, and at least the Catholic bishop spoke up against it, and the Pope took back his invitation to the Swedish Lutheran "Archbishop" to come to Rome that year. Yet this is what Lutheranism does. It is trying to attack Christianity even in its roots of respect for Christ.


Full link
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2006/12/former-swedish-lutheran-tells-his.html
Logged

"Nothing is more miserable than those people who never failed to attack their own salvation. When there was need to observe the Law, they trampled it under foot. Now that the Law has ceased to bind, they obstinately strive to observe it. What could be more pitiable that those who provoke God not only by transgressing the Law but also by keeping it? But at any rate the Jews say that they, too, adore God. God forbid that I say that. No Jew adores God! Who say so? The Son of God say so. For he said: "If you were to know my Father, you would also know me. But you neither know me nor do you know my Father". Could I produce a witness more trustworthy than the Son of God?"  St. John Chrysostom Sunday Homily


Phillipus Iacobus
Blue Fish
*
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,297


« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2012, 02:18:AM »

The above interview is pretty good.
Logged
Gerard
Banned for disrespecting the Holy Father, snarkiness, and rad-traddy negativism
Member

Posts: 4,699



« Reply #26 on: February 24, 2012, 10:05:AM »

Not because of Williamson's interview, but rather out of fear of not showing enough "outrage" over Williamson's comments on his comments from Canada back in the late 1980's. 
I only repeated what Bishop Fellay stated.

Bishop Fellay said a variety of things, some flip flopping previous statements.  That whole episode was Bishop Fellay's weakest moment and exposed a serious danger for the SSPX.  It caused a great deal of attention to be placed on Bishop Fellay's actions and a very healthy skepticism on the doctrinal discussions.  I think without the whole "Williamson Affair" the SSPX would have been absorbed into the Novus Ordo without any resolve on the part of the heirarchy to reverse the errors of Vatican II and the dismantling of the SSPX would be underway. 
Logged
Josué
Blue Fish
*
Gender: Male
Personality type: Sanguine
Posts: 1,293


St.Casimir pray for us.


« Reply #27 on: February 24, 2012, 01:45:PM »

Not because of Williamson's interview, but rather out of fear of not showing enough "outrage" over Williamson's comments on his comments from Canada back in the late 1980's. 
I only repeated what Bishop Fellay stated.

Bishop Fellay said a variety of things, some flip flopping previous statements.  That whole episode was Bishop Fellay's weakest moment and exposed a serious danger for the SSPX.  It caused a great deal of attention to be placed on Bishop Fellay's actions and a very healthy skepticism on the doctrinal discussions.  I think without the whole "Williamson Affair" the SSPX would have been absorbed into the Novus Ordo without any resolve on the part of the heirarchy to reverse the errors of Vatican II and the dismantling of the SSPX would be underway. 


please excuse my ignorance but what exactly happened?  Did he deny the holocaust or just the way the jews and other folks where killed?

this is confusing to me
Logged

Introibo ad altare Dei, ad Deum qui lætificat iuventutem meam.
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC