Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
June 20, 2013, 07:42:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
 
Author Topic: Rumored new doctrinal czar has liberation theology ties  (Read 1309 times)
SaintRafael
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Southern CA.
Personality type: Nervous Melancholic, with an abundance of black bile.
Posts: 1,762



« on: February 28, 2012, 12:04:PM »

Rumored new doctrinal czar has liberation theology ties
by John L Allen Jr
Feb. 28, 2012

http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/rumored-new-doctrinal-czar-has-liberation-theology-ties

"Although speculation about who’s in line for top Vatican jobs is a favorite indoor sport in Catholicism, usually to be taken with a grain of salt, you can sometimes tell a rumor is serious when pot shots start falling on the would-be nominee.

By that standard, Bishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller of Regensburg, Germany, has to be considered a hot tip for the next prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican’s powerful doctrine office currently headed by American Cardinal William Levada.

Levada will turn 76 in June, and it’s long been rumored that Müller, 64, is a top candidate to take over. This week, traditionalist Catholics in Italy began circulating e-mails suggesting that Müller, a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and a lifelong friend of Pope Benedict XVI, is not a man of “secure doctrine.”

Specifically, the e-mails faulted Müller for espousing suspect positions on the virginity of Mary (which he said in a 2003 book shouldn’t be understood in a “physiological” sense), the Eucharist (Müller has apparently counseled against using the term “body and blood of Christ” to describe the consecrated bread and wine at Mass), and ecumenism (last October, Müller declared that Protestants are “already part of the church” founded by Christ.)

Whatever evaluation one makes of those points, the e-mails suggest that rumors around Müller’s possible appointment have set off alarms in traditionalist circles.

Müller has long been something of a paradox. In Germany, he’s seen as a staunch defender of Catholic orthodoxy, often at odds with the liberal reform group “We Are Church”, and he clearly enjoys papal favor.

Aside from the fact that Müller is the bishop of the pope’s home diocese, where Benedict’s brother Geörg still resides, he’s also the editor of Benedict’s “Opera Omnia,” a comprehensive collection of all the pope’s writings.

Müller himself is a prolific author, having written more than 400 works on a wide variety of theological topics.

Despite his broadly conservative reputation, Müller actually earned his doctorate in 1977 under then-Fr. Karl Lehmann, who went on to become the cardinal of Mainz and the leader of the moderate wing of the German bishops’ conference. Müller’s dissertation was on the famed German Protestant theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Moreover, Müller is a close personal friend of the renowned Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutiérrez, considered the father of liberation theology. Every year since 1998, Müller has travelled to Peru to take a course from Gutiérrez, and has spent time living with farmers in a rural parish near the border with Bolivia.

In 2008, he accepted an honorary doctorate from the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, which is widely seen as a bastion of the progressive wing of the Peruvian church. On the occasion, he praised Guttierez and defended his theology.

“The theology of Gustavo Gutiérrez, independently of how you look at it, is orthodox because it is orthopractic,” he said. “It teaches us the correct way of acting in a Christian fashion since it comes from true faith.”

In the same speech, Müller described "neo-liberal capitalism" as the "infamy of our age."

All that suggests the church might be in for some surprises should Müller indeed inherit the Vatican’s top doctrinal job."
Logged
newyorkcatholic
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 4,595


terrena despicere


« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2012, 12:32:PM »

The title is worrying, but I'll hold off really worrying and just see what happens.
Logged

One human thought alone is worth more than the entire world, hence God alone is worthy of it. -- St. John of the Cross
CollegeCatholic
Banned for snarking meanness, disrespect toward the Holy Father, twisting what others say in order to mock them, etc.
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Personality type: ISTJ
Posts: 8,998


Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam


« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2012, 12:54:PM »

Sounds like a big tent church liberal.
Logged
Freudentaumel
Member

Posts: 629


« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2012, 05:10:PM »

The "conservative reputation" was made up by the German media, because the German media thinks that anyone, who is authoritarian is automatically conservative.
Bishop Müller is very authoritarian and attacks anyone who disagrees with him. He attacks both the SSPX and "We are Church" constantly. The latter led to the media calling him conservative.

According to him "the only dialogue with the SSPX I would agree to is giving them catechism lessons".
Logged

"What you make with our Lord?" -Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Mithrandylan
Banned for promoting sedevacantism
Regular

Gender: Male
Location: Tundra
Personality type: Melancholy- a point below phlegmatic
Posts: 10,141


Divínum auxílium ✝ maneat semper nobíscum.


« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2012, 05:43:PM »

Quote
Specifically, the e-mails faulted Müller for espousing suspect positions on the virginity of Mary (which he said in a 2003 book shouldn’t be understood in a “physiological” sense), the Eucharist (Müller has apparently counseled against using the term “body and blood of Christ” to describe the consecrated bread and wine at Mass), and ecumenism (last October, Müller declared that Protestants are “already part of the church” founded by Christ.)

If these accusations are true, this guy should be on the chopping block for excommunication, not facing a promotion to head of the CDF.

Although considering this is "just" a rumor, we can hold out hope that he won't get the job.  For now.
Logged


Crusading Philologist
Member

Gender: Male
Personality type: Melancholic-Choleric, INTJ
Posts: 3,421



« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2012, 06:08:PM »

Quote
Specifically, the e-mails faulted Müller for espousing suspect positions on the virginity of Mary (which he said in a 2003 book shouldn’t be understood in a “physiological” sense), the Eucharist (Müller has apparently counseled against using the term “body and blood of Christ” to describe the consecrated bread and wine at Mass), and ecumenism (last October, Müller declared that Protestants are “already part of the church” founded by Christ.)

If these accusations are true, this guy should be on the chopping block for excommunication, not facing a promotion to head of the CDF.

Although considering this is "just" a rumor, we can hold out hope that he won't get the job.  For now.

I think it would also be important to see those quotations in context before making any judgments.
Logged

Loyalty to a doctrine ends in adherence to the interpretation we give it.
Only loyalty to a person frees us from all self-complacency. - Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Freudentaumel
Member

Posts: 629


« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2012, 07:12:PM »

Quote
Specifically, the e-mails faulted Müller for espousing suspect positions on the virginity of Mary (which he said in a 2003 book shouldn’t be understood in a “physiological” sense), the Eucharist (Müller has apparently counseled against using the term “body and blood of Christ” to describe the consecrated bread and wine at Mass), and ecumenism (last October, Müller declared that Protestants are “already part of the church” founded by Christ.)

If these accusations are true, this guy should be on the chopping block for excommunication, not facing a promotion to head of the CDF.

Although considering this is "just" a rumor, we can hold out hope that he won't get the job.  For now.

I think it would also be important to see those quotations in context before making any judgments.
The first part is from his dogmatic theology book and pertains solely to the question of whether the virgin Mary stayed physiologically intact during the birth of Christ (which Bishop Müller calls into question). I know that this is taught by many fathers, but I don't know if it's a dogma.

I have never heard of the second part, and I doubt it because I have followed the squabble between Bishop Müller and the SSPX where they have unearthed every skeleton in his closet.

The third part is true. The full text can be found here. In it Bishop Müller says that  "Protestants and Catholics are already united in what we call visible Church. There are, to be precise, not several Churches, there are divisions and ruptures in the people of God, the House of the Lord".
Logged

"What you make with our Lord?" -Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Might_4_Right
Dyslexic to the nth degree
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,140



« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2012, 07:38:PM »

Quote
Specifically, the e-mails faulted Müller for espousing suspect positions on the virginity of Mary (which he said in a 2003 book shouldn’t be understood in a “physiological” sense), the Eucharist (Müller has apparently counseled against using the term “body and blood of Christ” to describe the consecrated bread and wine at Mass), and ecumenism (last October, Müller declared that Protestants are “already part of the church” founded by Christ.)


If these accusations are true, this guy should be on the chopping block for excommunication, not facing a promotion to head of the CDF.
Although considering this is "just" a rumor, we can hold out hope that he won't get the job.  For now.


I think it would also be important to see those quotations in context before making any judgments.


The first part is from his dogmatic theology book and pertains solely to the question of whether the virgin Mary stayed physiologically intact during the birth of Christ (which Bishop Müller calls into question). I know that this is taught by many fathers, but I don't know if it's a dogma.

I have never heard of the second part, and I doubt it because I have followed the squabble between Bishop Müller and the SSPX where they have unearthed every skeleton in his closet.

The third part is true. The full text can be found here. In it Bishop Müller says that  "Protestants and Catholics are already united in what we call visible Church. There are, to be precise, not several Churches, there are divisions and ruptures in the people of God, the House of the Lord".

Thanks for giving us a little more clarity on this topic. It's far to easy to get carried away on rumors.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2012, 08:53:PM by Might_4_Right » Logged

“I think hell's a fable” and Mephistopheles responds: “Ay, think so still—until experience change thy mind”
Tim
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Location: chicago
Posts: 12,604



« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2012, 09:48:PM »

I'm quite sure Mary's perpetual Virginity is a dogma, before and after the birth of Christ.

tim
Logged
Parmandur
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 3,518



« Reply #9 on: February 29, 2012, 02:13:AM »

I'm quite sure Mary's perpetual Virginity is a dogma, before and after the birth of Christ.

tim

Yes, but the question is whether she had a physiologically intact hymen after the birth of Our Lord.  Some of the Fathers did say that Christ passed through without breaching it, but it hardly seems necessary to insist on that point.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC