Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 24, 2013, 07:31:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
 
Author Topic: Rumored new doctrinal czar has liberation theology ties  (Read 1276 times)
CollegeCatholic
Banned for snarking meanness, disrespect toward the Holy Father, twisting what others say in order to mock them, etc.
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Personality type: ISTJ
Posts: 8,998


Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam


« Reply #20 on: February 29, 2012, 04:34:PM »

Remember, this appointment would come from the theologically-conservative/closet-trad/trad-friendly Pope.

Rolling eyes
Logged
Phillipus Iacobus
Blue Fish
*
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,297


« Reply #21 on: February 29, 2012, 04:35:PM »

Remember, this appointment would come from the theologically-conservative/closet-trad/trad-friendly Pope.

Rolling eyes

God's rottweiler, our traditional German shepherd!
Logged
Parmandur
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 3,357



« Reply #22 on: February 29, 2012, 04:57:PM »

I'm sorry I'm too old to buy into this new biological goofiness. That entire thing sounds to me like b s. It's the first step in declaring she wasn't a virgin except in some mystical way so the Prots. won't mind.  You see to me this is the problem. Why does it need to be investigated in the light of current science ?  Current science has about as much credibility as horse sh**. She's a Perpetual Virgin, so don't go there, all it does is make the intelligentia feel big, and confuse the rest.

tim

Frankly, you seem to be making the same point as the Bishop.
Logged

Freudentaumel
Member

Posts: 624


« Reply #23 on: February 29, 2012, 05:02:PM »

Remember, this appointment would come from the theologically-conservative/closet-trad/trad-friendly Pope.

Rolling eyes
I don't think it's appropriate to roll eyes over nothing but a rumor.
Logged

"What you make with our Lord?" -Bishop Athanasius Schneider
CollegeCatholic
Banned for snarking meanness, disrespect toward the Holy Father, twisting what others say in order to mock them, etc.
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Personality type: ISTJ
Posts: 8,998


Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam


« Reply #24 on: February 29, 2012, 05:13:PM »

Remember, this appointment would come from the theologically-conservative/closet-trad/trad-friendly Pope.

Rolling eyes
I don't think it's appropriate to roll eyes over nothing but a rumor.

The fact that these rumors could fly that such a seemingly-unworthy/incompetent/what-have-you bishop could be appointed as prefect of the CDF is beyond me and is telling.
Logged


Might_4_Right
Dyslexic to the nth degree
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 1,122



« Reply #25 on: February 29, 2012, 06:07:PM »

I'm quite sure Mary's perpetual Virginity is a dogma, before and after the birth of Christ.

tim

Yes, but the question is whether she had a physiologically intact hymen after the birth of Our Lord.  Some of the Fathers did say that Christ passed through without breaching it, but it hardly seems necessary to insist on that point.

I and others think that it is necessary, because it adds one more barrier to those who are constantly chipping away at Marys perpetual virginity.

After all If God chose this one woman above all that ever lived, or ever will live, to be kept immaculate and to give birth to the Saviour of the cosmos, giving her title of The Mother of God, then having her assumed physically into heaven, I see no problem with her being a perpetual virgin physically, i.e  physiologically intact hymen.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 06:53:PM by Might_4_Right » Logged

“I think hell's a fable” and Mephistopheles responds: “Ay, think so still—until experience change thy mind”
Parmandur
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 3,357



« Reply #26 on: February 29, 2012, 06:45:PM »

I'm quite sure Mary's perpetual Virginity is a dogma, before and after the birth of Christ.

tim

Yes, but the question is whether she had a physiologically intact hymen after the birth of Our Lord.  Some of the Fathers did say that Christ passed through without breaching it, but it hardly seems necessary to insist on that point.

I and others think that it is necessary, because it adds one more barrier to those who are constantly chipping away at Marys perpetual virginity.

After all If God chose this one woman above all that ever lived, or ever will live, to be kept immaculate and to give birth to the Saviour of the cosmos, giving her title of The Mother of God, then having her assumed physically into heaven, I see no problem with her being a perpetual virgin physically, i.e  physiologically intacted hymen.

Okay.  Knock yourself out.  If you want to think that Ludwig Ott was trying to chip away at the Blessed Virgin's Perpetual Virginity, be my guest.  Seems scrupulous to me, but whatever.
Logged

Tim
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Location: chicago
Posts: 12,330



« Reply #27 on: February 29, 2012, 10:09:PM »

This is making no sense, how anyone would think that you can deliver a baby and remain a virgin ? We were taught Jesus was delivered as a light passes through a pane of glass. On a human level who would ask his mother anything this personal ? This is creepier than anything I've ever heard.

tim
Logged
Parmandur
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 3,357



« Reply #28 on: March 01, 2012, 02:00:AM »

This is making no sense, how anyone would think that you can deliver a baby and remain a virgin ? We were taught Jesus was delivered as a light passes through a pane of glass. On a human level who would ask his mother anything this personal ? This is creepier than anything I've ever heard.

tim

You are the one who seems concerned with the physiology of the Blessed Virgin's state.  The Bishop, following the Scholastic consensus, does not want to view it that way.
Logged

Tim
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Location: chicago
Posts: 12,330



« Reply #29 on: March 01, 2012, 08:00:AM »

I'm quite sure Mary's perpetual Virginity is a dogma, before and after the birth of Christ.

tim

Yes, but the question is whether she had a physiologically intact hymen after the birth of Our Lord.  Some of the Fathers did say that Christ passed through without breaching it, but it hardly seems necessary to insist on that point.

Which side are you on ? The Bishop said she might be some other kind of virgin. He's promoting this. Am I miss reading his words ?
tim
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC