Crusading Philologist
Member
Gender: 
Personality type: Melancholic-Choleric, INTJ
Posts: 3,412
|
|
« Reply #30 on: March 19, 2012, 06:14:PM » |
|
Remember that Freemasonry was only condemned in 1738.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Loyalty to a doctrine ends in adherence to the interpretation we give it. Only loyalty to a person frees us from all self-complacency. - Nicolás Gómez Dávila
|
|
|
jovan66102
La foi Catholique d'abord! La mort à l'Islam!
Member
Gender: 
Location: Temporarily, Council Bluffs, IA
Posts: 14,052
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 19, 2012, 06:28:PM » |
|
Interesting, but my point was to question how the Freemasons could have assisted during the deformation when they weren't formed until two hundred years later.
That just refers to the Scottish ones though. The ones from the Continent, who knows when they were founded? Actually, it refers to the Grand Lodge of England, not Scotland. And all serious scholars of Freemasonry (non-Masonic) agree that the formation of the Grand Lodge of England is the origin of modern Freemasonry and that French Freemasonry was an import from Britain, brought by the predominantly Catholic Jacobite emigres.I highly doubt that Jovan. The masonic myth that the Stuarts brought freemasonry to France originated from a careless and unsubstantiated remark made by John Noorthouk in the 1784 Book of Constitutions of the Premier Grand Lodge of London and spiraled from there. There is no connection between Jacobite and Jacobin. The Jacobites were royalists who supported a Catholic monarch the same as the royalists like the Vendee did during the French Revolution. In contrast the Jacobins were both anti-royalists and anti-Catholic. Mike, with all due respect, I am neither ignorant nor stupid. I never implied that Jacobite and Jacobin were the same thing and I specifically pointed out that serious, non-Masonic, scholars of the history of Freemasonry have concluded that Freemasonry was imported into France by Catholic Jacobites. As Crusading Philologist pointed out, Freemasonry was not condemned until 1738 so there was no reason that the Jacobites would not be Brothers of the Lodge.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jovan-Marya Weismiller, T.O.Carm.
Vive le Christ-roi! Vive le roi, Louis XX!
Deum timete, regem honorificate.
|
|
|
damooster
Gold Fish

Gender: 
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 761
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 19, 2012, 07:54:PM » |
|
Tiny Update:
I've been trying to contact people to validate Mr. Salza's claims but I have not received any responses (not that I'm expecting any since I'm a nobody).
I will try to share something without breaking any rules or vows that I took: I'm witnessing, first hand, the beginnings of a rebellion by local knights against State and Supreme leadership. I'd be happy to explain in private messages.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mikemac
Member
Posts: 3,013
Queen of Canada. Canada was consecrated in 1954.
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 19, 2012, 08:10:PM » |
|
Interesting, but my point was to question how the Freemasons could have assisted during the deformation when they weren't formed until two hundred years later.
That just refers to the Scottish ones though. The ones from the Continent, who knows when they were founded? Actually, it refers to the Grand Lodge of England, not Scotland. And all serious scholars of Freemasonry (non-Masonic) agree that the formation of the Grand Lodge of England is the origin of modern Freemasonry and that French Freemasonry was an import from Britain, brought by the predominantly Catholic Jacobite emigres.I highly doubt that Jovan. The masonic myth that the Stuarts brought freemasonry to France originated from a careless and unsubstantiated remark made by John Noorthouk in the 1784 Book of Constitutions of the Premier Grand Lodge of London and spiraled from there. There is no connection between Jacobite and Jacobin. The Jacobites were royalists who supported a Catholic monarch the same as the royalists like the Vendee did during the French Revolution. In contrast the Jacobins were both anti-royalists and anti-Catholic. Mike, with all due respect, I am neither ignorant nor stupid. I never implied that Jacobite and Jacobin were the same thing and I specifically pointed out that serious, non-Masonic, scholars of the history of Freemasonry have concluded that Freemasonry was imported into France by Catholic Jacobites. As Crusading Philologist pointed out, Freemasonry was not condemned until 1738 so there was no reason that the Jacobites would not be Brothers of the Lodge. Yeah freemasonry was not condemned until 1738 by Clement XII. But the masonic myths range from James II to Charles Edward Stuart, the later losing the cause in 1746 long after freemasonry was condemned. Definitely not from the Stuarts and I kind of doubt the non-masonic scholars too. There are too many other scholars that say the opposite. "A lodge at Temple Bar in London is the earliest such lodge on record. Other lodges include a lodge at Bath in 1735, and the French lodge, St. George de l'Observance No. 49 at Covent Garden in 1736." More than likely migrated to France from England but I highly doubt it was by Catholic Jacobites. "The natural confusion between the names of the Jesuit College of Clermont, and the short-lived Masonic Chapter of Clermont, a Masonic body that controlled a few high degrees during its brief existence, only served to add fuel to the myth of Stuart Jacobite influence in Freemasonry's high degrees. However, the College and the Chapter had nothing to do with each other. The Jesuit College was located at Clermont, whereas the Masonic Chapter was not. Rather, it was named "Clermont" in honor of the French Grand Master, the Comte de Clermont (Louis de Bourbon, Comte de Clermont) (1709–1771), and not because of any connection with the Jesuit College of Clermont." On another note I did find that French song that recognizes the Vendee as Celtic. I posted it in my last post but thought some may miss it. Cool song. Someone should do an English version of it. It's titled 'Heroes of the Vendee'. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvs-QniMLxo
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 19, 2012, 08:12:PM by mikemac »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iuvenalis
Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!
Member
Gender: 
Location: California
Personality type: Picador
Posts: 4,152
Sacred Heart of Jesus, I trust in Thee!
|
|
« Reply #34 on: April 03, 2012, 10:37:PM » |
|
Remember that Freemasonry was only condemned in 1738.
Our Lady of Good Success, 1610 AD. Nope.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It is questionable whether the proper functions of Catholics is to hunt down, "expose" and condemn Catholics they suspect of undue rigidity, disobedience or "material schism"; especially while giving support to a Vatican ecumenical campaign which addresses heretics and actual Schismatics as "separated brethren", Jews as "people of the covenant" and Muslims as "people of God". This is part of the overall contradiction (or inconsistency) that permeates the "conservative" mentality. Cloaked in a pledged loyalty to all things "whatsoever" emanating from the Holy See, many "conservatives" will go beyond the measures taken by the Church leaders, or even disagree with their actual positions. The Hawaii "excommunications" were an obvious example but others can be seen. "Conservatives" denounce as "Schismatic" all those who set foot in SSPX chapels while the Vatican embraces the Schismatics in China. "Conservatives" deny any significant change at the Second Vatican Council while the Pope celebrates the enormity and impact of the changes. "Conservatives" seek the conversion of the Eastern "Orthodox" while the Vatican promises not to "proselytize" them. "Conservatives" deride American bishops while the Pope appoints and promotes the same ones." -Peter Miller "Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society When an immoral society has blatantly and proudly violated all the commandments, it insists upon one last virtue, tolerance for its immorality. It will not tolerate condemnation of its perversions. It creates a whole new world in which only the intolerant critic of intolerable evil is evil." - H. Gibson(5 x 10 x 17) x (5 x 10 x 17) ≠ 722,500
|
|
|
|
|
Geremia
Member
Gender: 
Posts: 1,231
|
|
« Reply #35 on: January 17, 2013, 01:36:AM » |
|
And they've infiltrated the Church. Still, the KofC overall seems to be an orthodox organization with a good amount of political clout.
Also, Salza, being an ex-Freemason, perhaps doesn't realize that the KofC was created, in part, to convert Freemasons.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poche
|
|
« Reply #36 on: January 17, 2013, 01:44:AM » |
|
Masons came and gave a presentation at the Catholic school of my parish. Why can that be allowed.
What did they say?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poche
|
|
« Reply #37 on: January 17, 2013, 01:48:AM » |
|
Why wouldn't they? It seems like the entire organization is based on being a Catholic Freemason. I really don't know much about them, except that my perception is that they exist to sell insurance. And new new blood to pay premiums.
Actually the Knights of Columbus was founded to be the anti-masons. That there may be some Catholics who go astray is nothing new. Judas sold Jesus for 30 pieces of silver and Peter denied him the very night he professed such strong friendship with him as to be willing to die for him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jacafamala
My mother, my confidence.
Gold Fish

Gender: 
Personality type: Auntie Mama
Posts: 8,927
Discorso della luna.
|
|
« Reply #38 on: January 17, 2013, 04:28:AM » |
|
My husband's a fourth degree knight. I've never seen there to be any connection with the Masons.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
rosamysticamantilla.com Above all things, preserve constant charity among yourselves; charity draws the veil over a multitude of sins. -1 Peter
|
|
|
|
Poche
|
|
« Reply #39 on: January 17, 2013, 04:36:AM » |
|
Remember that Freemasonry was only condemned in 1738.
In spite of the fact that the excommunication was not put in with the 1983 Code of Canon Law, membership n the Freemasons is still prohibited.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|