Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 18, 2013, 12:57:PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum > Church > Catholic News, Discussion, History, & Culture > ..........If an Agreement is Reached
Pages: [1] 2 3
 
Author Topic: ..........If an Agreement is Reached  (Read 1021 times)
salus
Member

Posts: 2,584
« on: June 26, 2012, 10:30:AM »
It will interesting to see what will happen if a deal is made and the SSPX comes in. One thing nobody mentions is if the SSPX priests come in how will they deal with the writings of Pope John Paul 2 (a huge bunch of those) especially since he's on the road to canonization. I know that many SSPX priests despise his scholarship and find them horrible. Check out the SSPX website or an SSPX chapel bookstore , they never cary any of the writings of the post Vatican 2 Popes, a very big problem when they come in.
Logged
SpiritusSanctus
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 76
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2012, 10:34:AM »
Well, I heard that if the Society "regularizes", they will have to use the CCC in their seminaries. That would be quite a compromise...
Logged
St. Raphael Forums has re-opened:

http://z13.invisionfree.com/straphaelforums/index.php?
cgraye
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Location: Maryland, United States of America
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 7,046
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2012, 10:37:AM »
It's not like the writings of JP II are in any way required reading, beyond his official work as pope.  I'm sure they will just ignore it or even criticize it.  I don't see any reason why the private theological writings of a pope could not be criticized.
Logged
Chris
Atomagenesis
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Empire State of the South
Posts: 1,322


All for Thee and naught for me.
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2012, 10:46:AM »
I don't think you can MAKE the SSPX use the new CCC. OLGS, the FSSP seminary, doesn't use it, they use the Catechism of the Council of Trent and other various sources, so why would the SSPX be required to?
Logged
SLCFranciscan
Member

Gender: Female
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Personality type: Melancholic
Posts: 333
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2012, 11:48:AM »
Quote from: cgraye
It's not like the writings of JP II are in any way required reading, beyond his official work as pope.  I'm sure they will just ignore it or even criticize it.  I don't see any reason why the private theological writings of a pope could not be criticized.

This.
Logged


Walty
Gold Fish
*
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,486
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2012, 04:50:PM »
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Well, I heard that if the Society "regularizes", they will have to use the CCC in their seminaries. That would be quite a compromise...

Where did you hear this?

I don't think +Fellay would make such a compromise.
Logged
Quote from: Rev. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange O.P.
The Church is intolerant in principle because she believes;
she is tolerant in practice because she loves.
The enemies of the Church are tolerant in principle because they do not believe;
 they are intolerant in practice because they do not love.

Timorem Domini docebo vos.
salus
Member

Posts: 2,584
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2012, 07:27:PM »
I doubt they would use the CCC at all, that is not the problem, do they ignore JP2 at their chapels while another side of the Church , the Catholic Answers crowd  cheers on JP2 on radio and TV non-stop , they will have to talk about him and his writings, but this will be a problem after the deal.
Logged
MRose
Member

Gender: Male
Posts: 911
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2012, 07:31:PM »
Quote from: Walty
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Well, I heard that if the Society "regularizes", they will have to use the CCC in their seminaries. That would be quite a compromise...

Where did you hear this?

I don't think +Fellay would make such a compromise.

Do they not call it the "Cate-schism"?

Which I find, by-the-by, a hilarious phrase/term!
Logged
Magníficat ✝ ánima mea Dóminum.
Et exsultávit spíritus meus: in Deo, salutári meo.
Quia respéxit humilitátem ancíllæ suæ: ecce enim ex hoc beátam me dicent omnes generatiónes.
Quia fecit mihi magna, qui potens est: et sanctum nomen ejus.
Et misericórdia ejus, a progénie in progénies: timéntibus eum.
Fecit poténtiam in bráchio suo: dispérsit supérbos mente cordis sui.
Depósuit poténtes de sede: et exaltávit húmiles.
Esuriéntes implévit bonis: et dívites dimísit inánes.
Suscépit Israël púerum suum: recordátus misericórdiæ suæ.
Sicut locútus est ad patres nostros: Ábraham, et sémini ejus in sæcula.
V. Glória Patri, et Fílio, et Spirítui Sancto.
R. Sicut erat in princípio, et nunc, et semper, et in sǽcula sæculórum. Amen.
CollegeCatholic
Banned for snarking meanness, disrespect toward the Holy Father, twisting what others say in order to mock them, etc.
Member

Gender: Male
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Personality type: ISTJ
Posts: 8,999


Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2012, 09:08:PM »
If the liberals can claim obedience to the Pope, why can't we?

It's not like seminaries actually teach Latin, like the rules state they must.
Logged
Mithrandylan
Banned for promoting sedevacantism
Regular

Gender: Male
Location: Tundra
Personality type: Melancholy- a point below phlegmatic
Posts: 10,141


Divínum auxílium ✝ maneat semper nobíscum.
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2012, 09:12:PM »
Quote from: CollegeCatholic
If the liberals can claim obedience to the Pope, why can't we?

It's not like seminaries actually teach Latin, like the rules state they must.

See, that's the awesome thing about Newchurch.  We're covered either way.  If they're right, we're covered under their religious liberty, and if they're wrong, well...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC