What better rule-of-thumb would you have than your own experience?
As for piety I am impressed by the piety expressed by certain people who adhere to this error, but I am also impressed with the quality of action by some members of the Masonic Lodges and also the piety expressed by many protestants.
This is a pointless statement. We're not discussing piety or quality of action.
I thought that I explained the use of the term "Luciferian" and thus justified it. The one creature who has an undying hatred for mankind is Lucifer. We are the cause of his fall. He would lead us into a false Church if he can.
You've made the claim. Now you are obligated to prove that the SSPV, which practices the Catholic faith exactly as it was practiced in 1955, has made no claims of separation, and has not elected their own pope, has set up a "false church."
I truly did not mean to slander anyone. It's the concept of sedevacantism and the practice which I am addressing.
And isn't there a "one and only sedvacantist thread" where one can slander sedevacantists with absurd epithets such as "luciferian" to their hearts content? Isn't this thread meant to discuss the SSPV and the SSPX?
This is not unprecedented. The Courts of Inquisition had to deal with false priests and nuns in the 13th century. They were the Fraticelli and the False-Apostles. They were very pious, wore the habit of St. Francis, had an order of Nuns but would not recognize the reigning Pope and elected their own who was infact an anti-Pope. It was very confusing to the Catholics at the time thus the matter was brought before the Courts.
The primary problem which the Inquisition was set up to deal with was Judaizers--Marranos and Cryptojews who had infiltrated the church and were seeking to destroy the Catholic religion from within.
You would attempt to spin the Inquisition into support of your personal crusade against sedevacantists and your theory that they are "luciferian," when the USCCB has stated that Rabbinic Judaism is from God? I suppose that I shouldn't be surprised that you avoid confronting my point.
Who are the real "luciferians" who have set up a "false church"? Is it the traditional Catholic society which practices the Catholic faith as it had been practiced for centuries? Or is it the New Order, half composed of homosexuals who tell us that Rabbinic Judaism, the religion of the Pharisees who killed our Lord and His Apostles, is "of God."?
Who's nature do you believe is reflected in this New Order statement? God's, or Lucifer's?
Rabbinic Judaism, which developed after the destruction of the Temple, must also be "of God" (Reflections on Covenant and Mission, §13, USCCB, Aug. 12, 2002)
I'd be interested to hear your response to this point.
In general both genders need to be attracted to a spiritual source to maintain balance.
Could you cite a single Catholic source which supports this strange belief? It sounds rather Eastern to me.
If "woman's intuition" is a valid indicator in spiritual matters, then I'm going to quit this Catholic stuff and go join a Kabbala group or some yoga-meditation-new age ashram, because that's where the intuition of most women is leading them. It certainly isn't leading the majority of women into traditional Catholic chapels.
Can you see how absurd this reasoning is, and why the Catholic Catechisms state nothing about "woman's intuition"?
I honestly can't believe that I've wasted this much effort on this absurd argument.