Fish Eaters Traditional Catholic Forum
May 19, 2013, 07:16:AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The man still needs help!
 
   Fish Eaters    Forum Index   Forum Rules   Help Calendar Members Chat Room   Who's Chatting   Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
 
Author Topic: Unam Sanctum  (Read 1453 times)
VoxClamantis
Guest
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2005, 03:56:AM »

FACT: The S.S.P.X. teaches the SAME Faith and offers the SAME Mass and Sacraments as all Roman Catholic priests did until 40-some years ago. They do not withdraw submission to the Pope, they pray for the Pope and local ordinary at each and every Mass, they desire no schism, they've not set up a "parallel church" by claiming ordinary jurisdiction.

 

FACT: The Orthodox deny the Catholic understanding of the papacy, purgatory, and the Immaculate Conception. They are heretics.

 

Now, can you explain why the neo-cats rail, rail, RAIL against the S.S.P.X., talking about them as "those Protestants," warn people away from them, etc., etc., ad nauseum, but embrace and apologize for the Orthodox as if there is no problem whatsoever? A sampling from EWTN's "Ask an Expert" columns:

 



Re-Converting Eastern Orthodox Christians
 
Question from on 12-23-2001: 
 
How many Orthodox Christians do you know that consider the Catholic and Orthodox as "Sister Churches"!. I don't know of any!. According to an Antiohcian Orthodox priest. The Catholic Church and Orthodox Church have "nothing" in common. And Eastern Catholics under the Bishop of Rome is an insult to Orthodoxy!. 
 

Answer by Anthony Dragani on 01-02-2002:
 
Bob,
 
To say that the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church have "nothing" in common is absolutely ridiculous. What about Jesus Christ? Don't Orthodox and Catholic Christians share a common devotion to the Lord? Don't we share in the one baptism? Do we not both partake of the Body and Blood of Christ?
 
I know of many Orthodox Christians who consider the Catholic and the Orthodox Church to be "Sister Churches." The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew I, signed a joint declaration with Pope John Paul II that says:
 
"Considering that in every local Church the mystery of divine love is realized and that this is how the Church of Christ shows forth its active presence in each one of them, the Joint Commission has been able to declare that our Churches recognize one another as Sister Churches, responsible together for safeguarding the one Church of God, in fidelity to the divine plan, and in an altogether special way with regard to unity. We thank the Lord of the Church from the bottom of our hearts because these affirmations we have made together not only hasten the way to solving the existing difficulties, but henceforth enable Catholics and Orthodox to give a common witness of faith."
 
- COMMON DECLARATION SIGNED IN THE VATICAN BY POPE JOHN PAUL II AND PATRIARCH BARTHOLOMEW I June 29, 1995
 
God Bless, Anthony
 


Orthodox and Communion
 
Question from on 05-23-2005:
 
Receiving communion in the Orthodox Church is a moot point because the Orthodox as a rule do not give communion to Catholics. Conversely, they excommunicate any of their members who receive communion in a Catholic Church. 

 
Answer by Robert J. Flummerfelt, J.C.L. on 05-23-2005: 
 
Hi John,
 
While this is true for most Orthodox Christians, this is NOT the case for all Orthodox Churches. Determinations about reception of Communion and under what circumstances are determined by which Eastern Orthodox Church you are talking about.
 
Regarding the Catholic perspective on receiving holy Communion by the Orthodox we permit it, but we also recognize that the Orthodox should respect their own discipline before receiving in our Church. CIC canon 844 is germane to the discussion.
 
Peace, Bob
 



Eastern Orthodox Church and Communion
 
Question from on 05-18-2005: 
 
When is it acceptable for an Eastern Orthodox Christian to receive communion in the Catholic Church and when is it acceptable for a Catholic to receive communion in an Eastern Orthodox Church? 
 

Answer by Colin B. Donovan, STL on 05-18-2005: 
 
This is settled by the Code of Canon Law.
 
For Catholics receiving from Orthodox:
 
Canon 844, 2. Whenever necessity requires or genuine spiritual advantage suggests, and provided that the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, it is lawful for the faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose churches these sacraments are valid.
 
For Orthodox receiving from Catholics:
 
c. 844, 3. Catholic ministers may licitly administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist and anointing of the sick to members of the oriental churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church, if they ask on their own for the sacraments and are properly disposed. This holds also for members of other churches, which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition as the oriental churches as far as these sacraments are concerned.


Receiving communion
 
Question from on 04-25-2005: 
 
I'm not sure if this is Canon Law, but all the bins are full and I'd like an answer: My brother-in-law & wife will be godparents to our baby-daughter, the christening is at Pentecost. Now, my sister-in-law is Greek-Orthodox (so, she's basically the 'Christian Witness'), and I was wondering: is she allowed to receive H.Communion during Mass (the christening is during the Family Mass with the whole parish present)? I know when we married, the priest allowed the Greek-Orthodox guests to receive H.Communion, but I'm thinking maybe that was because we got married in Cyprus...This time she'll be one of very few non-Catholics present, and I know she'll go up as she would do back home in Cyprus (we live in England). Is she 'allowed'or would she need to ask the priest first? I don't want to cause her any embarrassment, but I've heard different things from different people... 
 

Answer by Rev. Mark J. Gantley, JCL on 04-25-2005: 

Your Greek Orthodox sister-in-law may serve as the godmother, not merely as a Christian witness as if she were a Protestant or Anglican.
 
She is permitted to receive Holy Communion if this is what she wants (and she is the one taking the initiative). However, she may be prohibited from receiving Catholic communion by her own Church's laws.
 


Communion in Orthodox Churches
 
Question from on 03-08-2005: 
 
This is more about the Eastern Orthodox Churches than Eastern Catholic Churches but I figured you would take it. I am planning to go to Russia for about three weeks for a class. Part of the time I will be near Moscow, part on the southern coast of the white sea, and part on the Kola peninsula. How prevenent are the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Catholic Churches in these areas? Also, if I cannot get to a Catholic church I understand it is O.K. to go to an Orthodox church instead from the Catholic point of view (correct me if I'm wrong), but on Orthodox web pages, including that of the Russian Orthodox Church, I just found over and over again the statement that non-Orthodox were not permited to recieve the Eucharist from them. Therefore, will they permit me to revieve the Eucharist if I wish to? Finally, if it looks likely that I will not able to attend Mass at any church whatsoever for one or more Sundays, do you think a college course not required for graduation but which will be very helpfull is good enough reason to miss Mass, or at least to risk it? 
 

Answer by Anthony Dragani on 04-22-2005: 
 
Jason,
 
There are Catholic churches in Russia, although they are not nearly as prevalent as the Russian Orthodox churches. There are very few Eastern Catholic parishes there, however, and they may be extremely hard to find.
 
If it is not possible to get to a Catholic church on a Sunday, you are dispensed from the Sunday obligation. However, I would recommend attending a Russian Orthodox Church for Sunday Divine Liturgy. While you cannot receive communion, as most Orthodox priests do not allow this, you can still participate in the liturgy, which is in itself a heavenly experience.
 
Finally, if I was in your situation, I would avail myself of the opportunity and definitely go on the trip.
 
God bless, Anthony 

 


 

I could find PLENTY more.  'Splain that to me, Lucy.

Logged
littlepaddle
Member

Posts: 626


« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2005, 07:18:AM »


 


 

Orthodox and Communion
 
Question from on 05-23-2005:
 
Receiving communion in the Orthodox Church is a moot point because the Orthodox as a rule do not give communion to Catholics. Conversely, they excommunicate any of their members who receive communion in a Catholic Church. 

 I don't agree with the Orthodox, but in not giving communion to Roman catholics, who they believe have seperated from the true church, they are more apostolic then Roman Catholics, who now adays, give communion to anyone including non-catholics.  The apostles did not give communion to non-believers.

Logged
Jarrod_D
Member

Posts: 786


« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2005, 10:46:AM »

Ok front the top .... He said:

Quote

Yes schismatics have true and valid Sacraments. But everytime a conscious non-Catholic schismatic takes part of the Sacraments he commits a sacrilege. Their sacraments do not help those who actively reject(ed) Catholicism to perpetual salvation.

St. Jerome said: "Whoever eats this Lamb outside this House, shall perish, as did those outside the Ark during the flood." St. Augustine said: "One can have valid sacraments, one can say 'Alleluia' and 'Amen', but nowhere can one have eternal salvation except in the Catholic Church."

 Then I said ...

Quote

These are interesting quotes in our debate about the sspx and excommunication I must say.

Jarrod

 What I was saying is that the debate about the SSPX and excommunication means much more if we consider the above quote. If the sacraments offered by schismatics are sacrilege and "their sacraments do not help those who actively reject(ed) Catholicism to perpetual salvation," then it raises the stakes in our other debates. In this thread I never said "the sspx is in schism," nor did I make a judgment to that effect.  I said that these quotes are interesting in our debate about the sspx. I was not taking a stab at them. So,get over it.

 

Now the Individual quotes:

Quote
 

It would appear that way, yes. Jarrod always has something negative to say about them, this thread being the latest example.

 

It may appear that way, but it wasn't.  I didn't say anything negative about the SSPX.

 

Quote

Jarrod, you are making a fool out of yourself. To be outside the Church requires an explicit rejection of her teachings and her community.

 

I always make a fool out of myself.  I'm used to that! I may be wrong here but I was always taught that there is a distinction between heresy (explicit rejection of teachings) and schism (explicit rejection of her community).  Maybe I am wrong. 

 

Quote
Which does not apply to the SSPX. But this question is not at all about the SSPX and you seem to leave no opportunity unused to bash the SSPX. Sad and unprofessional.

 

How quick is one to heap stones at me.  What is sad and unprofessional is your rash judgment.

 

Quote

You can't have it both ways, Jarrod. If you profess Conciliarist you cannot use the fathers of the Church to bash the SSPX. Then you'll only be able to resort to Ecclesia Dei's "Schism" (1988) and name calling.

 

All these from one sentence? 

 

You guys are some inference drawing fools sometimes.

 

Jarrod

 

 

Logged
DominusTecum
Guest
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2005, 02:14:PM »

A la contraire, it is a stab at the SSPX, whether you meant it that way or not. When I read it (and I tend to be pretty impartial, though I would rather attend an SSPX service than an FSSP) I immediately thought "He's insinuating that the SSPX is schismatic, their masses ought to be avoided as 'outside the house,' etc." You may not have meant it that way, but that is how it came across.  

Logged
Jarrod_D
Member

Posts: 786


« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2005, 03:02:PM »

Quote
A la contraire, it is a stab at the SSPX, whether you meant it that way or not. When I read it (and I tend to be pretty impartial, though I would rather attend an SSPX service than an FSSP) I immediately thought "He's insinuating that the SSPX is schismatic, their masses ought to be avoided as 'outside the house,' etc." You may not have meant it that way, but that is how it came across.  

 

The only insinuation that was made was by you.

 

"These are interesting quotes in our debate about the sspx and excommunication I must say."

 

I never used the word schism.  Every logical person in the world will agree that congregation of Bishops did issue an excommunication letter (which I referred to), your argument is that it is not binding.

 

If it is binding though ... then those above quotes remain very interesting.

 

Jarrod

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Logged


Sophia
Guest
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2005, 06:54:PM »

 

Pardon me, Jarrod, but you did use the word "schism" twice in that very post, in the quote immediately preceeding the following comment:

 

"These are interesting quotes in our debate about the sspx and excommunication I must say."

Logged
Jarrod_D
Member

Posts: 786


« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2005, 08:29:AM »

Quote

Pardon me, Jarrod, but you did use the word "schism" twice in that very post, in the quote immediately preceeding the following comment:

 

"These are interesting quotes in our debate about the sspx and excommunication I must say."

 

This is like Alice in Wonderland ...

 

Im confused ...   

 

Jarrod

 

 

 

Logged
Quo_Vadis_Petre
Red Comet

Member

Posts: 3,691



« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2005, 10:47:AM »

Jarrod, Sophia means that you quoted Sander and applied it to the SSPX situation.

Logged

"In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics."   -St. Pius X

"If the Church were not divine, this Council [the Second Vatican Council] would have buried Her."   -Cardinal Giuseppe Siri

St. Peter Arbues, pray for us.
Pages: 1 [2]
 
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC