That's nonsense Maurice, and if your sedevacantism is merely based upon Benedict XVI's attitude towards Jewish lobby groups and Zionism, you in fact are not a well argumented sedevacantist.
Who said anything about sedevacantism? I've stated facts. The president of Iran is opposed to the Judaic enemy. The Catholic hierarchy is in bed with the Judaic enemy. This is undeniable fact.
I add, that truly a traditional Roman Catholic cannot approve of Iran's president, no matter what truth he might be saying.
I support Ahmadinejad in his opposition to Zionism. If the pope had a backbone like him maybe I would support him. I also support anti-Zionist "Orthodox Jews" in their opposition to Zionism.
I'm not waiting for the Catholic hierarchy or the remnant of "traditional Catholics" to save the world. They're too busy shooting themselves in the foot and stabbing each other in the back to make any positive change in the world. And neither am I waiting for Mary to come out of the sky and change everything.
While I have time left on earth I'm going to DO SOMETHING to serve God and bring the world into conformity with His law. I will be judged on how I lived my life. If I spend my life in a closet praying and waiting for the end while the world was being ravaged by the enemies of God, I fear that I would be judged very harshly for that.
I could as well support other things then, because they too have "something true" about them.
You do spend a lot of time practicing Judaic apologetics around here don't you? You've offered the information that you have a Talmudic rabbi associate, haven't you?
You're a hypocrite.
In fact, the motivation of Ahmadinejad to attack zionism, is an entirely different one than the traditional Catholic motivation.
And how have you come to know with such certainty what Ahmadinejad's motivation is? I'm quite tired of your delusional rantings which would require that you have supernatural powers in order to be true.
Isn't it possible that Ahmadinejad's motivation is two years worth of Zionist sabre rattling and pressuring of the US to attack Iran?
And as far as I can tell, the motivation of "traditional Catholics" is to see who can whine the most, and to see who can have the least amount of influence in the world. If traditional Catholics had some of the motivation that the Saints had in the past, maybe I wouldn't even be speaking of supporting an "Islamic extremist" in his opposition the Zionism. Maybe I would have some real allies in the fight against the enemies of God.
And while Iran's offenses are meant to stir up war tensions (both parties are guilty of that), our rejection should be done to bring the world and the Jews to the sweet yoke of Christ.
And how is practicing Judaic apologetics on a traditional Catholic discussion board contributing to bringing the world to the yoke of Christ?
Hypocrite.
The picture of Benedict XVI and Kasper with Bronfman is really sickening, considering Bronfman is prime responsible for the entire collapse of western culture by his vast capital supporting sexual perverts and violent low culture trash in their efforts to brainwash our youth.
Yes, it is sickening isn't it. So sickening that it makes Ahmadinejad seem virtuous in comparison.
It's not my fault that an "Islamic extremist" has more in common with the Saints and Church Fathers in this regard than the Catholic hierarchy does. So don't attack me for acknowledging the fact.
But of course the Vatican is now "afraid" of the power of a zionist organisation like WJC.
There you go again, dictating to all with great certainty what the Vatican's intent and motivation is, delusionally believing that you possess the supernatural ability to do so.
Enough already.
