Art Bell radio show this Sunday night about the current state of the Catholic Church

[Matthew1328]

I thought I would share this with everyone. On the Art Bell radio show on Sunday night, for his guest he is having on Rama Coomaraswamy. I have never heard of the person but their personal website does have alot of articles that talk about traditional Catholicism and the destruction that Vatican II has brought about (I glanced over alot of the articles so Im not sure what they all contain). Im not sure what to expect but it might be worth a listen if anyone is awake that late on Sunday night.

Art Bell Sunday night show info

[Croppyboy]

Coomaraswamy was a professor at St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary (SSPX) when it was located at Ridgefield. He left the seminary when Sanborn et alii were expelled by the Archbishop. He is a sedevacantist and I have heard that he was ordained (but this might just be a rumor).

He did write a good critique of the Novus Ordo Missæ, (The Problems With the New Mass. TAN. 1990).

[DominusTecum]

This fellow is vitirolic as they come. There was recently a two-part refutation of his thesis on the invalidity of Novus Ordo Episcopal Consecrations in the Angelus.

[gemma_philothea]

I can't wait until Fr. Cekada finishes his reply to that Angelus article.

 

I am almost salivating...lol.

[Carthusian]

I will be up studying late....so I will be able to listen to the show!!

[ernestus]

This fellow is vitirolic as they come.

:rolleyes:

[creimann]

I can't wait until Fr. Cekada finishes his reply to that Angelus article.

 

I am almost salivating...lol.

Where will he publish his refutation?

[ernestus]

I can't wait until Fr. Cekada finishes his reply to that Angelus article.

 

I am almost salivating...lol.

I'm not sure I understand why someone would say this, even in jest. It seems to me that if indeed the rite is invalid, that would not be something to salivate over. I think that it is very serious matter to even claim such a thing to be possible, and we should not have this attitude.

As I have not read the articles in the Angelus, I can't comment on them.

[gladius_veritatis]

I'm not sure I understand why someone would say this, even in jest. It seems to me that if indeed the rite is invalid, that would not be something to salivate over. I think that it is very serious matter to even claim such a thing to be possible, and we should not have this attitude.

If something is invalid, but held by almost all to be valid, they have been deceived and the Innovators have touched something they ought not to have touched. 

 

To eagerly await the vindication of God's glory (which is directly involved), which is effected by a sound rebuttal of a false argument supporting something which is invalid (as if it were valid), would not be inappropriate.

 

I am not up on the whole idea, as I have not even read the articles in The Angelus, but I can guess what they say fairly well (although if anyone has a link, I would appreciate it).  Since I guess the articles contain (very likely) more fuzzy Sacramental theology from the SSPX, I would also like to see any necessary corrections made. 

[DominusTecum]

more fuzzy Sacramental theology from the SSPX

 

Please elaborate, and substantiate your claim that the SSPX's sacramental theology is "fuzzy." That is a rather grave charge.